Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTFL-PT_D Topic 5 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL-PT_D exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 5
[All CTFL-PT_D Questions]

Base Scenario 1: This Base Scenario 1 is used for 2 questions throughout this exam. When you refer to Base Scenario 1, you are referring to this description and only this description, without any modification.

k given project for the development of a management software that will have a multilayer architecture will enable Its users to Install it in multiple locations, nationally and internationally - each installation can operate Independently and communicate with other instances in a selective way. Each installation shall have a high processing capacity.

Question specific constraints: (specific constraints are not part of the Base Scenario and are specific to this question).

* The project follows a sequential development life cycle model.

Question

Which is the right moment in the project to analyze and evaluate the performance risks?

SELECT ONE OPTION

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Spike testing involves subjecting a system to a significant increase in load for short periods of time to determine if it can handle sudden spikes in traffic. Emily's scenario of testing a system's response to a high number of concurrent users during specific periods and then returning to a stable state fits the description of spike testing.


* ISTQB Performance Testing Syllabus

* ISTQB Glossary

Contribute your Thoughts:

Shaunna
6 hours ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. I like the idea of evaluating risks during requirements and before tests, but repeatedly throughout the whole project is also a good call. Guess I'll have to flip a coin on this one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
4 days ago
I believe analyzing performance risks during the analysis and design activities, as well as before each performance test cycle, is crucial for the success of the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
6 days ago
I'm going with C. Analyzing performance risks during analysis, design, and before each test cycle seems like a more comprehensive approach than just doing it once or twice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
9 days ago
I agree with Kendra. It's important to assess risks before moving on to coding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
9 days ago
I think the answer is D. Performance risks should be analyzed and evaluated repeatedly throughout the development process, not just at specific points. Waiting until after design or just before testing seems too late to catch potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
16 days ago
I think the right moment to analyze performance risks is after design but before coding.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel