iSQI Exam CTFL-AuT Topic 9 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL-AuT exam

Question #: 40
Topic #: 9

Which statement characterizes back-to-back testing?

ABack-to-back testing is a variation of pair programming in which the testers should sit back to back to be able to work as independently as possible from each other.

BBack-to-back testing compares test objects with mainly overlapping requirements to recognize the results of requirement change.

CBack-to-back testing compares lest objects which are based on the same requirements.

DBack-to-back testing compares different execution environments of the same test object

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Nada at Apr 27, 2024, 03:06 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL-AuT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Chau

20 days ago

Back-to-back testing, huh? Sounds like a dance move gone wrong. I'll stick with C and hope I don't end up on my back.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bok

21 days ago

Sitting back-to-back to work independently? That's like trying to have a conversation with someone in another room. I'm going with C, it just makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Steffanie

1 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Option D sounds interesting, but I think C is the safest bet. Gotta love those overlapping requirements!

upvoted 0 times

Denae

13 hours ago

Option D does sound interesting, but I think sticking with C is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cordelia

17 days ago

User 1: I think option C is the safest bet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edison

21 days ago

I agree, C seems like a solid choice for back-to-back testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Agustin

24 days ago

I think C is the safest bet. Those overlapping requirements are key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharika

1 months ago

Back-to-back testing? That's a new one for me. I'll go with option C - comparing test objects based on the same requirements. Seems like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times