Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTFL-AuT Topic 1 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL-AuT exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 1
[All CTFL-AuT Questions]

You are a tester In a learn and you are supposed to test diagnostic functions and bus communications on the CAN bus. The development team provides you with compiled software code and control unit hardware. Which test environment Is the best choice considering the test types?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Colby
25 days ago
Haha, this question reminds me of that time I accidentally fried the entire CAN bus during testing. Good times, good times.
upvoted 0 times
Emeline
3 days ago
A) A MiL test environment, as the compiled software code can be Integrated cost efficiently into an environment model.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ezekiel
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Diagnosis functions and bus communications seem like they would be better tested in the actual vehicle. Option D might be the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
Erin
2 days ago
C: I see your point, but option C allows for testing bus communication with other participants, which is important for realism.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
4 days ago
B: I disagree, I believe option A is better. Using a MiL test environment can be cost efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willetta
10 days ago
A: I think option D is the best choice. Testing in the actual vehicle seems more realistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jani
1 months ago
I disagree. I believe a SIL test environment is the way to go. We can test the bus communication performance more efficiently in a simulated environment.
upvoted 0 times
Margurite
2 days ago
I disagree. I believe a SIL test environment is the way to go. We can test the bus communication performance more efficiently in a simulated environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
21 days ago
C) A hi test environment, as the bus communication with other participants can be tested dose to reality
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
22 days ago
B) A Sal test environment, since the performance of the bus communication can be tested better in this test environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
29 days ago
A) A MiL test environment, as the compiled software code can be Integrated cost efficiently into an environment model.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micah
1 months ago
I think option C is the best choice. Testing the bus communication with other participants in a HIL environment will give us a more realistic understanding of the system's performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
2 months ago
That's a good point, testing in a HiL environment could provide more realistic results. I see your perspective now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe C) A HiL test environment is better as it allows us to test bus communication with other participants closely to reality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
2 months ago
I think A) A MiL test environment is the best choice because we can integrate the software code into a model efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel