I'm a bit confused; I thought coding standards were supposed to improve efficiency, but now I'm not sure if that means programmer efficiency or code efficiency.
I'm a bit confused by the wording of these options. Aren't efficiency and maintainability kind of related when it comes to coding standards? I'll have to re-read this a few times to make sure I understand the nuance.
Okay, let's see. Coding standards are meant to make the code more readable and consistent, right? So I'd say the answer that best captures that is B - they should educate the programmer.
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know coding standards are important, but I'm not confident I can distinguish between all the different potential benefits. I'll have to think this through carefully.
I've got this one! The answer is 'C. Outer function's scope'. The inner function 'bat' has access to the variable 'a' because it's defined in the outer function 'foo'. Scope is the key here.
Regenia
3 months agoKatie
3 months agoJoesph
3 months agoDusti
4 months agoLayla
4 months agoAshton
4 months agoRicarda
4 months agoNobuko
4 months agoVilma
5 months agoKallie
5 months agoNobuko
5 months agoTiffiny
5 months agoBlondell
5 months agoNoel
5 months agoIvan
10 months agoElin
8 months agoSonia
9 months agoQueenie
9 months agoTyisha
10 months agoPrecious
9 months agoMaile
10 months agoGianna
10 months agoLoise
10 months agoJonelle
10 months agoShantay
10 months agoClaribel
10 months agoLynelle
10 months agoBrent
10 months agoJules
10 months agoBecky
11 months agoErnest
9 months agoIzetta
9 months agoDaryl
10 months agoCristal
10 months agoMa
11 months ago