I'm a bit confused; I thought coding standards were supposed to improve efficiency, but now I'm not sure if that means programmer efficiency or code efficiency.
I'm a bit confused by the wording of these options. Aren't efficiency and maintainability kind of related when it comes to coding standards? I'll have to re-read this a few times to make sure I understand the nuance.
Okay, let's see. Coding standards are meant to make the code more readable and consistent, right? So I'd say the answer that best captures that is B - they should educate the programmer.
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know coding standards are important, but I'm not confident I can distinguish between all the different potential benefits. I'll have to think this through carefully.
I've got this one! The answer is 'C. Outer function's scope'. The inner function 'bat' has access to the variable 'a' because it's defined in the outer function 'foo'. Scope is the key here.
Regenia
6 months agoKatie
6 months agoJoesph
6 months agoDusti
7 months agoLayla
7 months agoAshton
7 months agoRicarda
7 months agoNobuko
7 months agoVilma
8 months agoKallie
8 months agoNobuko
8 months agoTiffiny
8 months agoBlondell
8 months agoNoel
8 months agoIvan
1 year agoElin
12 months agoSonia
12 months agoQueenie
12 months agoTyisha
1 year agoPrecious
1 year agoMaile
1 year agoGianna
1 year agoLoise
1 year agoJonelle
1 year agoShantay
1 year agoClaribel
1 year agoLynelle
1 year agoBrent
1 year agoJules
1 year agoBecky
1 year agoErnest
12 months agoIzetta
12 months agoDaryl
1 year agoCristal
1 year agoMa
1 year ago