D is definitely the way to go. Agile's focus on responding to change means the codebase is in a constant state of flux, making regression a major concern.
D is definitely the way to go. Agile's focus on responding to change means the codebase is in a constant state of flux, making regression a major concern.
I think B is the correct answer. AuBrigetteated tests can sometimes introduce new issues or fail to catch regressions, increasing the risk of software regression.
Option D seems like the most reasonable answer. The constant change in business needs during sprints can lead to significant code churn, making regression a high risk in agile projects.
I believe regression is built into software as a safeguard against unexpected failures, but it can still be a high risk in agile projects due to the constant changes.
Gabriele
23 days agoPilar
26 days agoBonita
3 days agoIsabella
13 days agoBarbra
1 months agoRaina
7 days agoBarney
18 days agoBrigette
1 months agoLorean
2 months agoLezlie
7 days agoElliott
13 days agoShalon
1 months agoGianna
2 months agoHorace
2 months agoMargery
2 months ago