New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CTFL-AT Exam - Topic 1 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL-AT exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 1
[All CTFL-AT Questions]

Which of the following statements about the Planning poker test estimate technique are CORRECT?

1) Planning poker is a consensus based technique using a deck of cards.

2) A low test estimate usually means the story should be broken down into multiple smaller stories.

3) A high test estimate usually means the story should be broken down into multiple smaller stories.

4) One poker round is played and then consensus has to be reached.

5) The risk level of each backlog item should be decided before the poker session.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Rosina at Aug 04, 2024, 01:20 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL-AT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Carmelina
3 months ago
Not sure if one round is enough for consensus, seems rushed!
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
3 months ago
I agree, low estimates usually mean smaller stories.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about the risk level being decided beforehand?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
4 months ago
I think a high estimate means breaking it down too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilda
4 months ago
Planning poker definitely uses cards for consensus!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
4 months ago
I recall that we usually reach consensus after multiple rounds, so I'm uncertain about statement 4 being correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like statement 3 is off because a high estimate usually indicates we might need to keep the story as is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think a low estimate means we should break down the story, which makes statement 2 sound right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
5 months ago
I remember that Planning poker is definitely a consensus-based technique, so I think statement 1 is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
5 months ago
This is a good test of our understanding of planning poker. I feel pretty confident in my knowledge of the technique, so I'll go with option A. The consensus-based approach and the need to break down stories based on the estimate seem like the key points to focus on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the question. Does the risk level of each backlog item really need to be decided before the poker session? I'm not sure about that one. I'll have to double-check my notes on planning poker.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. A low estimate usually means the story should be broken down, while a high estimate usually means the same. That makes sense to me. I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky, and I'm not entirely confident in my understanding of planning poker. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
5 months ago
Hmm, this one seems pretty straightforward. I'll go with option B - 1, 2, and 3 seem to be the correct statements about planning poker.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the question. Can the DevOps engineer already assume the role in the other accounts? If so, then option A might be the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
1 year ago
I believe the correct answers are A) 1, 3, 5 because it's important to consider the risk level before estimating.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
1 year ago
I'm not sure about statement 5, but I think 1 and 3 are definitely correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
1 year ago
I agree with Tamie, those statements make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
1 year ago
I think the correct statements are 1, 3, and 5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
1 year ago
I think statement 5 is important to consider the risk level, so I agree with Melita and Rossana.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
2 years ago
I'm not sure about statement 5, I think it should be 1, 2, and 4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
2 years ago
I agree with Melita, those statements make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
2 years ago
I think the correct statements are 1, 3, and 5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
2 years ago
Hold up, are we sure the poker round is only played once? I thought it was an iterative process until we reach consensus. I'll go with option D just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Janna
1 year ago
Yeah, I agree. Let's go with option D for now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
2 years ago
I think you're right, it is an iterative process until consensus is reached. Option D seems like the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katheryn
2 years ago
Definitely option B. A low estimate means we need to break it down, and a high one means the same. Simple as that, no need to overthink it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
2 years ago
Ah, planning poker. It's like a game of Texas Hold'em, but with fewer chips and more awkward silences. Option B is the way to go, my friends.
upvoted 0 times
Quinn
2 years ago
Let's make sure to break down stories if the test estimate is too low.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
2 years ago
I agree, option B seems to cover the correct statements about planning poker.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
2 years ago
Planning poker is a great technique for estimating test efforts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel