Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CTFL-AcT Exam - Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Which one of the following statements regarding the quality of requirements is MOST correct?
A) Vague or ambiguous requirements may lead to misunderstandings both during implementation and testing.
B) In Agile development lifecycle models, requirement engineering becomes less important due to the product owner role.
C) INVEST is a technique that ensure the quality of user stories or requirements, thus replacing regular reviews.
D) Testers may complete unclear requirements by assumptions, as long as they discuss those assumptions with at least one stakeholder.

iSQI CTFL-AcT Exam - Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL-AcT exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All CTFL-AcT Questions]

Which one of the following statements regarding the quality of requirements is MOST correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Dominque at May 10, 2022, 02:11 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL-AcT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Val
8 months ago
D is risky. Relying on assumptions can lead to big problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
9 months ago
Wait, C says INVEST replaces reviews? That sounds too good to be true!
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
9 months ago
B seems off. Requirement engineering is still crucial in Agile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
9 months ago
Totally agree with A. Clear requirements are key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
9 months ago
A is spot on! Ambiguity can really mess things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
9 months ago
For D, I feel like making assumptions could lead to bigger issues later on. It seems risky to rely on just one stakeholder's input.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
9 months ago
I'm not sure about B. I thought requirement engineering was still important in Agile, even with a product owner involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
9 months ago
I remember we talked about how vague requirements can really mess things up during testing. I think A might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
9 months ago
I vaguely recall something about INVEST being a guideline for user stories, but I'm not sure if it replaces reviews entirely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
9 months ago
Okay, let's see. The Verify Scope process is all about confirming that the project deliverables match the approved scope. I'm pretty sure the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) would be a key input for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between a public group and a permission set. I'll need to review those concepts before deciding which approach to recommend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
10 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky question. I'll need to think carefully about the characteristics of antennas used for high-speed rail coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
10 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Direct labor and manufacturing supplies are clearly product costs under variable costing, while insurance and packaging/shipping are more likely to be period costs. I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel