MENU
You are the Test Manager of a new project aimed at developing a software system that must be certified at level B of the DO-178B standard. The project will follow a V-Model software development life cycle and it will have four formal levels of testing: component, integration, system and acceptance testing.
You must produce the test plan documentation for this project by providing an adequate coordination across the four levels of testing in order to assure audit ability.
Which of the following answers would you expect to best describe how to organize the test plan?
K3 2 credits
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
FR
Freida
11 months ago
B could work, but I prefer C for better coordination.
DE
Delila
11 months ago
Wait, why would you skip a master plan? Seems risky.
MA
Magnolia
12 months ago
I agree with C, it keeps everything organized.
MA
Mattie
12 months ago
A single master plan sounds too complicated.
MA
Mariann
12 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense for clarity.
EL
Elden
1 year ago
I lean towards option C as well, since it allows for detailed planning at each level while still maintaining an overview in the master plan.
PR
Precious
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like option B could work, but it might not provide enough detail for the acceptance testing.
NO
Noelia
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure, but I think having separate plans for each level could lead to inconsistencies. Option A seems too detailed, though.
JE
Jeannetta
1 year ago
I remember we discussed the importance of having a master test plan to ensure coordination across all levels, so I think option C might be the best choice.
GE
Georgiana
1 year ago
The question is asking about the maximum MIMO supported, so I'm guessing the answer is the one with the highest number of transmit and receive antennas, which would be 4T8R.
GA
Gaynell
1 year ago
For some reason, I'm leaning towards transparency as the best answer here, but data control feels like it could be relevant too.
LO
Lonny
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know IPMP groups are used for network interface redundancy, so that's a good starting point.
EL
Elli
1 year ago
I remember a similar question where it distinguished between innovators and early adopters. I think Jason's purchase after some fixes makes him an early adopter.
LA
Lashandra
1 year ago
Haha, Option D is like trying to build a house without a blueprint. Wouldn't that be a fun challenge for the auditors?
HE
Helga
1 year ago
C) Produce a master test plan describing the relationship between the four levels, and four separate detailed level test plans, one for each level
DI
Dino
1 year ago
B) Produce a master test plan that covers three levels (component, integration, system test) and a separate acceptance test plan
BR
Brock
1 year ago
A) Produce a single master test plan that covers in detail all four levels, describing the particular activities for all test levels
WI
Willow
1 year ago
Option D? No way! Without a master test plan, how are we supposed to ensure coordination across the different test levels? That's just a recipe for chaos.
MA
Marti
1 year ago
C) Produce a master test plan describing the relationship between the four levels, and four separate detailed level test plans, one for each level
MA
Margurite
1 year ago
B) Produce a master test plan that covers three levels (component, integration, system test) and a separate acceptance test plan
CA
Candra
1 year ago
A) Produce a single master test plan that covers in detail all four levels, describing the particular activities for all test levels
TO
Tony
1 year ago
I agree, Option C is the way to go. Separating the detailed test plans by level while maintaining a high-level master plan is the most organized and thorough approach.
AD
Adell
1 year ago
Agreed, having separate detailed test plans for each level along with a master test plan is the most comprehensive way to organize the testing process.
AR
Arlean
1 year ago
I think having a master test plan that describes the relationship between the four levels is crucial for ensuring coordination and auditability.
MA
Madonna
1 year ago
Option C is definitely the best choice. It allows for detailed planning at each level while still having an overarching master plan.
WI
Winfred
1 year ago
Option C sounds like the best approach. A master test plan that outlines the relationships between the four levels, along with individual level-specific test plans, would ensure comprehensive coverage and auditability.
LE
Leatha
1 year ago
I agree, having a master test plan to show the relationships between the levels and detailed plans for each level would definitely help in coordinating the testing process effectively.
BR
Brock
1 year ago
Option C sounds like the best approach. A master test plan that outlines the relationships between the four levels, along with individual level-specific test plans, would ensure comprehensive coverage and auditability.
LE
Leonor
2 years ago
But having a master test plan that covers all levels could be too overwhelming.
LE
Lezlie
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option A is more comprehensive.
LE
Leonor
2 years ago
I think option C is the best approach.