iSQI CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Exam - Topic 3 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam

Question #: 37
Topic #: 3

[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

You are the Test Manager of a new project aimed at developing a software system that must be certified at level B of the DO-178B standard. The project will follow a V-Model software development life cycle and it will have four formal levels of testing: component, integration, system and acceptance testing.

You must produce the test plan documentation for this project by providing an adequate coordination across the four levels of testing in order to assure audit ability.

Which of the following answers would you expect to best describe how to organize the test plan?

K3 2 credits

AProduce a single master test plan that covers in detail all four levels, describing the particular activities for all test levels

BProduce a master test plan that covers three levels (component, integration, system test) and a separate acceptance test plan

CProduce a master test plan describing the relationship between the four levels, and four separate detailed level test plans, one for each level

DProduce four separate detailed level test plans, one for each level, without a master test plan

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Olive at Feb 24, 2023, 06:12 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Freida

4 months ago

B could work, but I prefer C for better coordination.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delila

4 months ago

Wait, why would you skip a master plan? Seems risky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Magnolia

4 months ago

I agree with C, it keeps everything organized.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mattie

4 months ago

A single master plan sounds too complicated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mariann

4 months ago

I think option C makes the most sense for clarity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elden

5 months ago

I lean towards option C as well, since it allows for detailed planning at each level while still maintaining an overview in the master plan.

upvoted 0 times

...

Precious

5 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I feel like option B could work, but it might not provide enough detail for the acceptance testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noelia

5 months ago

I'm a bit unsure, but I think having separate plans for each level could lead to inconsistencies. Option A seems too detailed, though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeannetta

5 months ago

I remember we discussed the importance of having a master test plan to ensure coordination across all levels, so I think option C might be the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgiana

5 months ago

The question is asking about the maximum MIMO supported, so I'm guessing the answer is the one with the highest number of transmit and receive antennas, which would be 4T8R.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gaynell

5 months ago

For some reason, I'm leaning towards transparency as the best answer here, but data control feels like it could be relevant too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonny

5 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. I know IPMP groups are used for network interface redundancy, so that's a good starting point.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elli

5 months ago

I remember a similar question where it distinguished between innovators and early adopters. I think Jason's purchase after some fixes makes him an early adopter.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashandra

9 months ago

Haha, Option D is like trying to build a house without a blueprint. Wouldn't that be a fun challenge for the auditors?

upvoted 0 times

Helga

8 months ago

C) Produce a master test plan describing the relationship between the four levels, and four separate detailed level test plans, one for each level

upvoted 0 times

...

Dino

8 months ago

B) Produce a master test plan that covers three levels (component, integration, system test) and a separate acceptance test plan

upvoted 0 times

...

Brock

9 months ago

A) Produce a single master test plan that covers in detail all four levels, describing the particular activities for all test levels

upvoted 0 times

...

Willow

10 months ago

Option D? No way! Without a master test plan, how are we supposed to ensure coordination across the different test levels? That's just a recipe for chaos.

upvoted 0 times

Marti

9 months ago

C) Produce a master test plan describing the relationship between the four levels, and four separate detailed level test plans, one for each level

upvoted 0 times

...

Margurite

9 months ago

B) Produce a master test plan that covers three levels (component, integration, system test) and a separate acceptance test plan

upvoted 0 times

...

Candra

9 months ago

A) Produce a single master test plan that covers in detail all four levels, describing the particular activities for all test levels

upvoted 0 times

...

Tony

10 months ago

I agree, Option C is the way to go. Separating the detailed test plans by level while maintaining a high-level master plan is the most organized and thorough approach.

upvoted 0 times

Adell

9 months ago

Agreed, having separate detailed test plans for each level along with a master test plan is the most comprehensive way to organize the testing process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlean

9 months ago

I think having a master test plan that describes the relationship between the four levels is crucial for ensuring coordination and auditability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Madonna

9 months ago

Option C is definitely the best choice. It allows for detailed planning at each level while still having an overarching master plan.

upvoted 0 times

...

Winfred

10 months ago

Option C sounds like the best approach. A master test plan that outlines the relationships between the four levels, along with individual level-specific test plans, would ensure comprehensive coverage and auditability.

upvoted 0 times

Leatha

10 months ago

I agree, having a master test plan to show the relationships between the levels and detailed plans for each level would definitely help in coordinating the testing process effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...