iSQI Exam CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Topic 2 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam

Question #: 84
Topic #: 2

[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

During the follow-up phase the following conditions are checked:

X1. The code has been completely reviewed

X2. All the identified defects have been correctly fixed and the modified code has been compiled successfully and run through all the static analyzers used by the project without warnings and errors X3. The modified code is available under the configuration management system with a new version number for the specified CI

If these conditions are fulfilled then the review process terminates.

Which of the following characteristics of a formal review is missing in this description? K2 1 credit

ADefined entry and exit criteria

BChecklists to be used by the reviewers

CDeliverables such as reports, evaluation sheets or other review summary sheets

DMetrics for reporting on the review effectiveness, efficiency, and progress

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Sage at Jul 06, 2025, 08:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Emilio

3 days ago

Deliverables like reports seem important, but I can't recall if they were specifically mentioned in our review materials.

upvoted 0 times

...

Golda

9 days ago

I remember we discussed checklists in our last practice session, so maybe option B is what they're looking for here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sanjuana

14 days ago

I think the missing characteristic might be related to defined entry and exit criteria, but I'm not entirely sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenna

20 days ago

This is a tricky one. The conditions described cover the technical steps of the review process, but they don't mention anything about the formal review characteristics like defined entry/exit criteria or review documentation. I'll need to carefully consider the answer choices to identify the missing element.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tijuana

25 days ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key thing that's missing is the formal documentation and reporting aspects of the review process, like checklists, evaluation sheets, and metrics for measuring the effectiveness and efficiency of the review. I'll make sure to select the right answer choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larae

1 month ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking about the characteristics of a formal review, but the conditions given seem to focus more on the technical aspects of the review process. I'll need to think carefully about what's missing in terms of the formal review process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marilynn

1 month ago

This question seems straightforward. The conditions described cover the technical aspects of the review process, but it's missing the formal characteristics like defined entry/exit criteria, checklists, and review documentation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavera

4 months ago

Metrics? Oh, you mean like how many coffee breaks the reviewers take? That's the only metric I'm interested in!

upvoted 0 times

Keva

2 months ago

C) Deliverables such as reports, evaluation sheets or other review summary sheets

upvoted 0 times

...

Sabra

2 months ago

B) Checklists to be used by the reviewers

upvoted 0 times

...

Evangelina

2 months ago

A) Defined entry and exit criteria

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryln

4 months ago

I think metrics for reporting on the review effectiveness, efficiency, and progress are essential for evaluating the review process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebeca

4 months ago

Metrics? What is this, a popularity contest? I just want to get this review done and move on to the next task. Who needs numbers, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

Danica

2 months ago

User 2: I agree, they help us improve and track our progress.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shannon

3 months ago

User 1: Metrics are important for evaluating the review process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Moon

4 months ago

I believe checklists to be used by the reviewers are also crucial for a formal review.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alease

4 months ago

Hmm, no review summary sheets or other deliverables? That's a red flag. How will the stakeholders track the progress and effectiveness of the review?

upvoted 0 times

...

Odette

4 months ago

I agree with Lakeesha, having clear entry and exit criteria is important for a formal review process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ettie

4 months ago

I agree, the lack of checklists for the reviewers is a significant oversight. How can they ensure a consistent and thorough evaluation without that guidance?

upvoted 0 times