Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Topic 1 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 1
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

In the next two months some new features will be constantly added to new releases of a project you are working on as Test Manager.

You have identified as one of the main project risks, that the requirements specification will still be incomplete when your team starts the test design and implementation phase.

Some requirements will most likely be completed too late to allow a proper test preparation. You and your test team have already worked on several similar past projects in the same organization.

Which one of the following options would you expect to be the most effective at mitigating this risk?

K4 3 credits

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Elvera
17 days ago
Escalating the risk without preparing any tests? That's like trying to fight a fire with a squirt gun. Option B is the only sensible choice here, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
20 days ago
Haha, Option A is a joke, right? Just running the regression suite? That's like trying to put a Band-Aid on a broken leg. Option B is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
1 months ago
Option C is just asking for trouble. Communicating that test execution is blocked is not going to solve anything. We need to be proactive and work with what we have.
upvoted 0 times
Richelle
4 days ago
Option B sounds like the best approach. We can design lightweight tests that can be easily updated as more details become available.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
8 days ago
I agree, being proactive and making reasonable assumptions will help us stay on track with testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
9 days ago
Option B seems like the most practical approach. We can design lightweight tests that can be easily updated as more details come in.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bonita
2 months ago
I agree with Becky. Option B is the best choice here. We can't afford to not prepare any tests or wait until the last minute. Making assumptions and designing flexible tests is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
2 months ago
Option B seems like the most reasonable approach. Designing lightweight tests that can be easily updated is better than not testing at all or delaying the process. We've dealt with incomplete requirements before, so this approach should work.
upvoted 0 times
Katlyn
24 days ago
I agree, it's important to adapt to the situation and find a solution that allows us to continue testing effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
27 days ago
Option B seems like the most reasonable approach. Designing lightweight tests that can be easily updated is better than not testing at all or delaying the process. We've dealt with incomplete requirements before, so this approach should work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Van
2 months ago
I disagree. I think we should escalate the risk to the project manager if there are missing details. It's better to communicate the issue upfront.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
2 months ago
I agree with Rosalia. It's important to have some tests prepared, even if the requirements are incomplete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalia
2 months ago
I think option B is the most effective. We can make assumptions and design lightweight tests that can be easily updated.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel