Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CTAL-TAE Exam - Topic 8 Question 34 Discussion

You are working on a TAS for standalone application. The automated tests are developed based on a automation framework that allows interaction with GUI elements using on object orientated API. The GUI elements include menus, buttons, radio buttons, text toolbars and their properties.Whilst automating a test, you have discovered that the GUI elements of some third party components are not identifiable by the automated tool you are using.Which of the following is the FIRST step that you take to investigate this issue?
C) Adopt an approach that uses the coordinates of the GUI elements instead
A) Verify the testability support with the providers of the third party components
B) Verify whether the GUI identification depends on the browser.
D) Verify whether naming standards for variables and have been defined for the current automation solution

iSQI CTAL-TAE Exam - Topic 8 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TAE exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 8
[All CTAL-TAE Questions]

You are working on a TAS for standalone application. The automated tests are developed based on a automation framework that allows interaction with GUI elements using on object orientated API. The GUI elements include menus, buttons, radio buttons, text toolbars and their properties.

Whilst automating a test, you have discovered that the GUI elements of some third party components are not identifiable by the automated tool you are using.

Which of the following is the FIRST step that you take to investigate this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Mariann at Jul 19, 2026, 08:05 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Yan
3 days ago
D feels a bit off, naming standards won’t fix the core problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
8 days ago
I’m surprised this is an issue, thought all components would be identifiable!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
13 days ago
C is a workaround, but not ideal for maintainability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
18 days ago
B seems important too, could be a browser issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
24 days ago
I’d go with A, definitely need to check with the providers first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
29 days ago
I feel like using coordinates could be a workaround, but it seems like a last resort. I’d want to explore other options first before going that route.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
1 month ago
I practiced a similar question before, and I chose to verify the testability support. It just makes sense to get information directly from the source.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
1 month ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about browser compatibility affecting GUI identification. Maybe checking that first could help narrow down the issue?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
1 month ago
I think the first step should be to verify the testability support with the providers of the third party components. That seems logical since they would know best about their own products.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel