This is a tricky one. I'm not entirely confident, but I'm leaning towards option D. The idea of reactive strategies needing more manual testing to adapt to the current project context makes sense to me.
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. The key is to understand that as more tests get automated, the manual testing can shift to focus on the areas that aren't covered by the automated tests. That's what option B is describing, I believe.
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this one. I'm not sure if I fully understand the relationship between automated testing and reactive manual testing strategies. I'll need to think this through carefully.
This question seems straightforward. I think option C is the best answer - as more tests get automated, manual testing can focus on the riskier areas that are identified reactively.
I'm a bit unsure about this. The question mentions the Service Perimeter Guard pattern being used in combination with other patterns, so I'm not sure if that changes the answer. I'll have to think this through carefully.
D) Reactive strategies consider the current context and status of the project and the system under test. To be able to adopt to this status most flexible a greater degree of manual testing is necessary
Viola
3 months agoTess
3 months agoBarney
3 months agoJamie
4 months agoCaitlin
4 months agoBreana
4 months agoMariann
4 months agoGayla
4 months agoGlen
5 months agoJustine
5 months agoGerald
5 months agoSoledad
5 months agoLeota
5 months agoPeggy
5 months agoCecilia
5 months agoHyman
5 months agoMattie
2 years agoKathrine
2 years agoCeleste
2 years agoRaylene
2 years agoJoanna
2 years agoWilda
2 years agoJanine
2 years agoPearly
2 years agoSheldon
2 years agoTammy
2 years agoKizzy
2 years agoFreida
2 years agoChu
2 years agoVilma
2 years agoIsabelle
2 years agoRebbecca
2 years agoMattie
2 years ago