iSQI Exam CTAL-ATT Topic 3 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-ATT exam

Question #: 46
Topic #: 3

You are developing a test automation suite for an agile project and want to include as much coverage as possible Unfortunately one of the critical web services (e-commerce checkout) is not scheduled for completion until the later iterations Which of the following would be a good option to allow you to progress with your end-to-end test automation without creating too much extra work?

AWrite the missing web service yourself and then hand over that code to the developers for further refinement

BHave the automation create a stub to replace the service for each execution and destroy the stub after execution is complete

CUse a service virtualization tool to create a virtualized service to be used by the test automation

DUse a service from a legacy product and integrate it with the system to allow use by the test automation

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Amber at Sep 16, 2024, 07:11 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-ATT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Coral

10 months ago

Writing the service ourselves? What is this, amateur hour? C all the way, baby! Let's get this show on the road!

upvoted 0 times

...

Leslie

10 months ago

Option D? Really? Using a legacy service? That's like putting a band-aid on a broken arm. C is the only logical choice here, folks.

upvoted 0 times

Nicolette

9 months ago

But wouldn't writing the missing web service ourselves be risky? I think option C is the safest bet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hana

9 months ago

I think we should go with option B, creating a stub seems like a good workaround for now.

upvoted 0 times

...

Desmond

9 months ago

Yeah, using a service virtualization tool would save us a lot of time and effort.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ilda

9 months ago

I agree, option C is definitely the best choice in this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Olive

10 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about writing the service ourselves. Sounds like a lot of extra work that's not really our job, you know? C is the clear winner here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nicolette

10 months ago

Ooh, C for sure. Virtualization is the way to go when you need that coverage but can't wait on the real deal. Smooth sailing from here on out!

upvoted 0 times

Cristy

9 months ago

C) Use a service virtualization tool to create a virtualized service to be used by the test automation

upvoted 0 times

...

Willetta

9 months ago

B) Have the automation create a stub to replace the service for each execution and destroy the stub after execution is complete

upvoted 0 times

...

Nichelle

9 months ago

C) Use a service virtualization tool to create a virtualized service to be used by the test automation

upvoted 0 times

...

Estrella

10 months ago

I agree, C is definitely the best choice here. It allows us to mock the service and still get our end-to-end tests running without unnecessary hassle.

upvoted 0 times

Lawana

9 months ago

I agree, C is definitely the best choice here. It allows us to mock the service and still get our end-to-end tests running without unnecessary hassle.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celestina

9 months ago

Let's go with that option then, it seems like the most practical solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

9 months ago

It's definitely the most efficient way to progress with our automation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaun

9 months ago

C) Use a service virtualization tool to create a virtualized service to be used by the test automation

upvoted 0 times

...

Gearldine

10 months ago

B) Have the automation create a stub to replace the service for each execution and destroy the stub after execution is complete

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettye

10 months ago

Agreed, using a service virtualization tool will make things much easier.

upvoted 0 times

...

Penney

10 months ago

I think option C is the best choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gaynell

10 months ago

I'm not sure about option C. I think option B could also work well by creating a stub to replace the service for each execution. It might be simpler and more flexible.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ozell

11 months ago

Option C seems like the way to go. Service virtualization tools can really help us move forward without relying on unfinished components.

upvoted 0 times

Sherell

9 months ago

Virtualizing the service will save us time and allow us to progress with our test automation efforts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raylene

9 months ago

Yes, it's a smart choice to use service virtualization in this scenario to ensure our test automation can progress smoothly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Geoffrey

10 months ago

I agree, using a virtualized service will definitely help us continue with our end-to-end test automation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosita

10 months ago

It's a smart choice to not wait for the completion of the web service and instead use a virtualized service for automation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beula

10 months ago

I agree, using a virtualized service will definitely help us continue with our end-to-end testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hubert

10 months ago

Option C seems like the way to go. Service virtualization tools can really help us move forward without relying on unfinished components.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carli

10 months ago

Option C seems like the way to go. Service virtualization tools can really help us move forward without relying on unfinished components.

upvoted 0 times

...

Earleen

11 months ago

I agree with Vicente. Option C seems like the most efficient way to progress with our end-to-end test automation without waiting for the completion of the critical web service.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vicente

11 months ago

I think option C is the best choice. Using a service virtualization tool would allow us to create a virtualized service for our test automation.

upvoted 0 times

...