iSQI CTAL-ATT Exam - Topic 2 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-ATT exam

Question #: 18
Topic #: 2

According to the syllabus, which of the following is a correct statement about automation in a mission-critical system versus a non-critical system?

AAutomation is more important with the mission-critical system as the risk increases

BAutomation is less important with the non-critical system as the risk increases

CAutomation is at the same level for both systems as the risk increases

DAutomation is not recommended for the non-critical system at any risk level, but is recommended for the mission-critical system

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Leota at Jul 05, 2023, 10:37 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-ATT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Candra

6 months ago

C is just not realistic, automation levels should vary with risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgiana

6 months ago

B seems off to me, automation should always help reduce risks, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Roslyn

7 months ago

Wait, is it really that risky? I thought non-critical systems were pretty chill.

upvoted 0 times

...

Holley

7 months ago

I disagree, I think D makes more sense. Non-critical systems can still benefit from automation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annmarie

7 months ago

A is definitely true, mission-critical systems need that extra layer of automation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

7 months ago

I vaguely recall something about D suggesting automation isn't needed for non-critical systems, but that seems a bit extreme. I’m torn!

upvoted 0 times

...

Launa

7 months ago

I practiced a similar question where we discussed the importance of automation in different contexts. I think A aligns with what I learned.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kendra

8 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like there was something about automation being less crucial in non-critical systems. Maybe B could be right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Laura

8 months ago

I remember studying that mission-critical systems definitely require more robust automation due to higher risks. So, I think A makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sue

8 months ago

Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about which one describes a factor that could reduce effort without affecting quality.

upvoted 0 times

...

Crissy

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this. I thought Scrum teams had a fixed sprint length, so I'm a bit confused. I'll have to think this through more carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zoila

1 year ago

I'd have to go with option A. Automation is a key tool for managing mission-critical systems, especially when the stakes are high. That's just common sense, right?

upvoted 0 times

Sueann

11 months ago

User 3: It's a no-brainer, option A is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marcos

12 months ago

User 2: Definitely, the risk is higher so automation helps manage that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teri

12 months ago

User 1: I agree, automation is crucial for mission-critical systems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shantay

1 year ago

Haha, I bet the exam writers were trying to trick us with that one. As if automation would be less important as the risk increases - that's just backwards!

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacinta

1 year ago

I don't know, option D seems a bit extreme to me. Automation can still be useful for non-critical systems, even if the risk is lower. Why limit it completely?

upvoted 0 times

Veronika

12 months ago

User 3: But what about non-critical systems? Shouldn't we still consider automation for them, even if the risk is lower?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothy

1 year ago

User 2: I agree with you. It's crucial to have automation in place for mission-critical systems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Renea

1 year ago

Ryann: But what about non-critical systems? Shouldn't we still consider automation for them?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ryann

1 year ago

User 2: I agree, automation can help reduce errors in critical systems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louisa

1 year ago

User 1: I think option A makes sense. The higher the risk, the more important automation becomes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Salome

1 year ago

User 1: I think option A makes sense. The higher the risk, the more important automation becomes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alease

1 year ago

Option A seems logical, as automation can help mitigate risks in mission-critical systems. The increased risk would make automation more important in those cases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paz

1 year ago

I see both points, but I think C) Automation is at the same level for both systems as the risk increases makes sense too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaime

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe D) Automation is not recommended for the non-critical system at any risk level, but is recommended for the mission-critical system.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katina

1 year ago

I think A) Automation is more important with the mission-critical system as the risk increases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sabrina

1 year ago

But wouldn't it make sense to prioritize automation in the mission-critical system to minimize risks?

upvoted 0 times

...

Patrick

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is C) Automation is at the same level for both systems as the risk increases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sabrina

1 year ago

I think the correct statement is A) Automation is more important with the mission-critical system as the risk increases.

upvoted 0 times

...