Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI Exam CTAL-ATT Topic 2 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-ATT exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-ATT Questions]

According to the syllabus, which of the following is a correct statement about automation in a mission-critical system versus a non-critical system?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Leota at Jul 05, 2023, 10:37 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-ATT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Zoila
3 months ago
I'd have to go with option A. Automation is a key tool for managing mission-critical systems, especially when the stakes are high. That's just common sense, right?
upvoted 0 times
Sueann
1 months ago
User 3: It's a no-brainer, option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
2 months ago
User 2: Definitely, the risk is higher so automation helps manage that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, automation is crucial for mission-critical systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shantay
3 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers were trying to trick us with that one. As if automation would be less important as the risk increases - that's just backwards!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
3 months ago
I don't know, option D seems a bit extreme to me. Automation can still be useful for non-critical systems, even if the risk is lower. Why limit it completely?
upvoted 0 times
Veronika
2 months ago
User 3: But what about non-critical systems? Shouldn't we still consider automation for them, even if the risk is lower?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
2 months ago
User 2: I agree with you. It's crucial to have automation in place for mission-critical systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
2 months ago
Ryann: But what about non-critical systems? Shouldn't we still consider automation for them?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, automation can help reduce errors in critical systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
3 months ago
User 1: I think option A makes sense. The higher the risk, the more important automation becomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
3 months ago
User 1: I think option A makes sense. The higher the risk, the more important automation becomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alease
3 months ago
Option A seems logical, as automation can help mitigate risks in mission-critical systems. The increased risk would make automation more important in those cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
3 months ago
I see both points, but I think C) Automation is at the same level for both systems as the risk increases makes sense too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe D) Automation is not recommended for the non-critical system at any risk level, but is recommended for the mission-critical system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
4 months ago
I think A) Automation is more important with the mission-critical system as the risk increases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
4 months ago
But wouldn't it make sense to prioritize automation in the mission-critical system to minimize risks?
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) Automation is at the same level for both systems as the risk increases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
4 months ago
I think the correct statement is A) Automation is more important with the mission-critical system as the risk increases.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel