Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CTAL-ATT Exam - Topic 2 Question 18 Discussion

According to the syllabus, which of the following is a correct statement about automation in a mission-critical system versus a non-critical system?
A) Automation is more important with the mission-critical system as the risk increases
B) Automation is less important with the non-critical system as the risk increases
C) Automation is at the same level for both systems as the risk increases
D) Automation is not recommended for the non-critical system at any risk level, but is recommended for the mission-critical system

iSQI CTAL-ATT Exam - Topic 2 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-ATT exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-ATT Questions]

According to the syllabus, which of the following is a correct statement about automation in a mission-critical system versus a non-critical system?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Leota at Jul 05, 2023, 10:37 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-ATT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Candra
9 months ago
C is just not realistic, automation levels should vary with risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
9 months ago
B seems off to me, automation should always help reduce risks, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
10 months ago
Wait, is it really that risky? I thought non-critical systems were pretty chill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
10 months ago
I disagree, I think D makes more sense. Non-critical systems can still benefit from automation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
10 months ago
A is definitely true, mission-critical systems need that extra layer of automation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
10 months ago
I vaguely recall something about D suggesting automation isn't needed for non-critical systems, but that seems a bit extreme. I’m torn!
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we discussed the importance of automation in different contexts. I think A aligns with what I learned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like there was something about automation being less crucial in non-critical systems. Maybe B could be right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
11 months ago
I remember studying that mission-critical systems definitely require more robust automation due to higher risks. So, I think A makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
11 months ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about which one describes a factor that could reduce effort without affecting quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this. I thought Scrum teams had a fixed sprint length, so I'm a bit confused. I'll have to think this through more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zoila
1 year ago
I'd have to go with option A. Automation is a key tool for managing mission-critical systems, especially when the stakes are high. That's just common sense, right?
upvoted 0 times
Sueann
1 year ago
User 3: It's a no-brainer, option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely, the risk is higher so automation helps manage that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, automation is crucial for mission-critical systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shantay
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers were trying to trick us with that one. As if automation would be less important as the risk increases - that's just backwards!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
1 year ago
I don't know, option D seems a bit extreme to me. Automation can still be useful for non-critical systems, even if the risk is lower. Why limit it completely?
upvoted 0 times
Veronika
1 year ago
User 3: But what about non-critical systems? Shouldn't we still consider automation for them, even if the risk is lower?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
1 year ago
User 2: I agree with you. It's crucial to have automation in place for mission-critical systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
1 year ago
Ryann: But what about non-critical systems? Shouldn't we still consider automation for them?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, automation can help reduce errors in critical systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
1 year ago
User 1: I think option A makes sense. The higher the risk, the more important automation becomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
1 year ago
User 1: I think option A makes sense. The higher the risk, the more important automation becomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alease
1 year ago
Option A seems logical, as automation can help mitigate risks in mission-critical systems. The increased risk would make automation more important in those cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
1 year ago
I see both points, but I think C) Automation is at the same level for both systems as the risk increases makes sense too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe D) Automation is not recommended for the non-critical system at any risk level, but is recommended for the mission-critical system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
1 year ago
I think A) Automation is more important with the mission-critical system as the risk increases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
1 year ago
But wouldn't it make sense to prioritize automation in the mission-critical system to minimize risks?
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) Automation is at the same level for both systems as the risk increases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
1 year ago
I think the correct statement is A) Automation is more important with the mission-critical system as the risk increases.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel