Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI CTAL-ATT Exam - Topic 2 Question 18 Discussion

Posted by Leota on Jul 05, 2023 at 10:37 PM

According to the syllabus, which of the following is a correct statement about automation in a mission-critical system versus a non-critical system?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium CTAL-ATT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
CA
Candra 11 months ago
C is just not realistic, automation levels should vary with risk.
GE
Georgiana 11 months ago
B seems off to me, automation should always help reduce risks, right?
RO
Roslyn 11 months ago
Wait, is it really that risky? I thought non-critical systems were pretty chill.
HO
Holley 11 months ago
I disagree, I think D makes more sense. Non-critical systems can still benefit from automation.
AN
Annmarie 12 months ago
A is definitely true, mission-critical systems need that extra layer of automation.
PA
Paris 12 months ago
I vaguely recall something about D suggesting automation isn't needed for non-critical systems, but that seems a bit extreme. I’m torn!
LA
Launa 12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we discussed the importance of automation in different contexts. I think A aligns with what I learned.
KE
Kendra 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like there was something about automation being less crucial in non-critical systems. Maybe B could be right?
LA
Laura 1 year ago
I remember studying that mission-critical systems definitely require more robust automation due to higher risks. So, I think A makes sense.
SU
Sue 1 year ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about which one describes a factor that could reduce effort without affecting quality.
CR
Crissy 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this. I thought Scrum teams had a fixed sprint length, so I'm a bit confused. I'll have to think this through more carefully.
ZO
Zoila 1 year ago
I'd have to go with option A. Automation is a key tool for managing mission-critical systems, especially when the stakes are high. That's just common sense, right?
SU
Sueann 1 year ago
↳ replying to Zoila
User 3: It's a no-brainer, option A is the way to go.
MA
Marcos 1 year ago
↳ replying to Zoila
User 2: Definitely, the risk is higher so automation helps manage that.
TE
Teri 1 year ago
↳ replying to Zoila
User 1: I agree, automation is crucial for mission-critical systems.
SH
Shantay 1 year ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers were trying to trick us with that one. As if automation would be less important as the risk increases - that's just backwards!
JA
Jacinta 1 year ago
I don't know, option D seems a bit extreme to me. Automation can still be useful for non-critical systems, even if the risk is lower. Why limit it completely?
VE
Veronika 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jacinta
User 3: But what about non-critical systems? Shouldn't we still consider automation for them, even if the risk is lower?
DO
Dorothy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jacinta
User 2: I agree with you. It's crucial to have automation in place for mission-critical systems.
RE
Renea 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jacinta
Ryann: But what about non-critical systems? Shouldn't we still consider automation for them?
RY
Ryann 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jacinta
User 2: I agree, automation can help reduce errors in critical systems.
LO
Louisa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jacinta
User 1: I think option A makes sense. The higher the risk, the more important automation becomes.
SA
Salome 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jacinta
User 1: I think option A makes sense. The higher the risk, the more important automation becomes.
AL
Alease 1 year ago
Option A seems logical, as automation can help mitigate risks in mission-critical systems. The increased risk would make automation more important in those cases.
PA
Paz 1 year ago
I see both points, but I think C) Automation is at the same level for both systems as the risk increases makes sense too.
JA
Jaime 1 year ago
I disagree, I believe D) Automation is not recommended for the non-critical system at any risk level, but is recommended for the mission-critical system.
KA
Katina 1 year ago
I think A) Automation is more important with the mission-critical system as the risk increases.
SA
Sabrina 2 years ago
But wouldn't it make sense to prioritize automation in the mission-critical system to minimize risks?
PA
Patrick 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) Automation is at the same level for both systems as the risk increases.
SA
Sabrina 2 years ago
I think the correct statement is A) Automation is more important with the mission-critical system as the risk increases.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel