Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI CTAL-ATT Exam - Topic 11 Question 75 Discussion

You are testing a mission-critical system and want to use exploratory testing for part of the testing. According to the syllabus, what is the correlation between this type of testing and the risk level of the item being tested?
C) High = highly recommended, Medium = highly recommended, Low = highly recommended
A) High = recommended, Medium = recommended, Low = highly recommended
B) High = recommended, Medium = highly recommended, Low = highly recommended
D) High = not recommended, Medium = recommended, Low = highly recommended

iSQI CTAL-ATT Exam - Topic 11 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-ATT exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 11
[All CTAL-ATT Questions]

You are testing a mission-critical system and want to use exploratory testing for part of the testing. According to the syllabus, what is the correlation between this type of testing and the risk level of the item being tested?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Exploratory Testing and Risk Levels:

Exploratory testing is a flexible approach that involves simultaneous test design and execution, making it highly valuable across all risk levels.

For high-risk systems, exploratory testing is essential as it uncovers critical issues efficiently.

For medium- and low-risk systems, it is equally beneficial for identifying functional and usability defects, especially when formal test cases may not cover all scenarios.

Analyzing the Options:

A and B: These fail to emphasize the importance of exploratory testing for high-risk systems.

D: States that exploratory testing is 'not recommended' for high-risk systems, which is inaccurate.

C: Correctly states that exploratory testing is 'highly recommended' across all risk levels, aligning with the ISTQB syllabus guidance.


ISTQB Advanced Agile Technical Tester syllabus highlights exploratory testing as a versatile and valuable technique for all risk levels.

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Clorinda
22 days ago
I’m leaning towards A. Low risk shouldn’t be over-tested.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
27 days ago
I feel like option B is better. Medium risk deserves more attention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
1 month ago
I think option C makes sense. High risk needs thorough exploration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
1 month ago
Surprised there's no option for low risk being less recommended!
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
1 month ago
Not sure about C, seems too risky for high items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
2 months ago
Wait, isn't A a better choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
2 months ago
Definitely agree with C!
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
2 months ago
I think it's C, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
2 months ago
I thought exploratory testing was always good for medium and low risks, but I can't recall the specifics for high risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
2 months ago
I feel like I might be mixing up the recommendations. Was it B or D that said low risk is highly recommended?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
2 months ago
I remember something about high-risk needing more attention, so maybe it's C? That seems to fit with what we practiced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
3 months ago
I think exploratory testing is more crucial for high-risk items, but I'm not sure about the exact correlation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel