Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISM LEAD Exam - Topic 2 Question 35 Discussion

Posted by Chauncey on Apr 04, 2026 at 04:59 AM

A buyer from BCD, Inc. meets with an industry peer at a professional conference and tells the peer that Supplier X provides a low quality product, when in fact Supplier X provides a high quality product. The buyer makes the statement in the hope of retaining BCD's competitive edge, but as result of the conversation, the peer removes Supplier X from participation in an upcoming RFP. The buyer's statement can BEST be described as

Suggested Answer: B

The buyer's statement can best be described as slander. Here's a detailed explanation:

Slander Defined:

Verbal Defamation: Slander involves making false and damaging statements about someone verbally. In this case, the buyer's verbal claim about Supplier X's product quality fits this definition.

Damage to Reputation: The false statement about Supplier X's product quality was intended to harm the supplier's reputation, fulfilling the criteria for slander.

Why Not Other Options?

Extortion (A): Extortion involves obtaining something through force or threats, which is not applicable here.

Libel (C): Libel refers to written defamation, whereas the buyer's statement was verbal.

Disparagement (D): Disparagement involves making false statements about the quality of a product or service. While similar, slander is the more specific term for verbal defamation.


Legal definitions and distinctions between slander and libel (Black's Law Dictionary).

Principles of ethical communication in supply chain management (Institute for Supply Management, Ethics in Supply Management).

Get Premium LEAD Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
21 comments · newest first
IZ
Izetta 2 months ago
Glad we sorted that out!
AL
Alyce 2 months ago
Same here, it fits perfectly.
BE
Ben 2 months ago
Yes, I feel confident about that.
IZ
Izetta 3 months ago
So, we all think D is the best answer?
AL
Alyce 3 months ago
And it worked, they got removed from the RFP.
BE
Ben 3 months ago
Right, the intent was to mislead.
IZ
Izetta 3 months ago
Makes sense. It's about damaging their business.
AL
Alyce 3 months ago
Exactly, that's why it's disparagement.
BE
Ben 3 months ago
True, but it affects Supplier X's reputation.
IZ
Izetta 4 months ago
But what about slander? It's spoken.
AL
Alyce 4 months ago
I agree, it's definitely disparagement.
BE
Ben 4 months ago
This is tricky. I think it's disparagement.
PE
Penney 4 months ago
I thought libel was for written statements, not spoken ones!
EA
Earleen 4 months ago
Wait, are we sure Supplier X is actually high quality?
LU
Lucina 4 months ago
Really? I thought it might be slander since it was spoken.
FL
Flo 6 months ago
Totally agree, that's a classic case of disparagement!
JA
Janine 6 months ago
It's definitely disparagement since it's about harming Supplier X's reputation.
SA
Salome 7 months ago
I practiced a question like this before, and I think disparagement fits best because it involves false statements about a competitor.
LO
Loreen 7 months ago
I feel like this is a tricky one. It could be libel if it were written, but since it's spoken, maybe it's just slander?
AD
Adell 7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about slander being spoken statements. Is that what this is?
FR
Frankie 7 months ago
I think this might be related to disparagement since the buyer is trying to harm Supplier X's reputation.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel