Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISC2 ISSMP Exam - Topic 2 Question 89 Discussion

Posted by Billi on Jul 01, 2024 at 06:26 AM

Which of the following can be prevented by an organization using job rotation and separation of duties policies?

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium ISSMP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
42 comments · newest first
PA
Pansy 10 months ago
Wait, can job rotation really stop collusion? Sounds too simple!
LA
Lavonna 11 months ago
Eavesdropping? I don't think that's related.
JO
Joaquin 11 months ago
Definitely A! Separation of duties is key.
TA
Tammy 11 months ago
Not so sure about that, collusion can still happen.
NI
Nickolas 11 months ago
Job rotation helps prevent collusion for sure.
MI
Michel 12 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought job rotation could help with various security issues, but I can't remember if it specifically prevents phishing.
MA
Maybelle 12 months ago
Eavesdropping seems more related to technical controls, right? I don't think job rotation would help with that.
GE
Georgene 12 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we discussed how these policies help mitigate risks, especially collusion. That seems to fit here.
GW
Gwen 1 year ago
I think job rotation and separation of duties are mainly about preventing collusion, but I'm not entirely sure if they can stop other issues too.
WI
Willard 1 year ago
Eavesdropping, buffer overflow, and phishing are more technical security issues, so I don't think job rotation and separation of duties would be the best way to prevent those. Collusion seems like the most relevant option here.
SH
Shonda 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I know job rotation and separation of duties are important security practices, but I'm not confident they can prevent all the options listed. I'll have to think this through carefully.
CA
Caren 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about security controls. I think job rotation and separation of duties can help prevent collusion, so I'll go with option A.
HA
Haydee 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. Job rotation and separation of duties are designed to limit the power and access of any single individual, which can help prevent collusion. That makes option A the most likely answer in my opinion.
CY
Cyndy 1 year ago
This seems straightforward enough. I just need to do the math carefully and double-check my work. I'm confident I can figure this out.
TE
Teri 1 year ago
I've got a strategy - I'll eliminate the options that I'm sure are incorrect, then focus on the remaining ones to determine the right answer.
IS
Isidra 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the output would be in the Playbook Editor, since that's where you can see the details of each task.
IZ
Izetta 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions "term of business" as one of the options, but I'm not sure what that means in this context. I'll have to think carefully about the differences between the answer choices.
NO
Noemi 1 year ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I bet the correct answer is A - Collusion. Those policies are all about reducing the risk of insider threats, right?
LA
Lavera 1 year ago
↳ replying to Noemi
Novella: Absolutely, that's why it's important to have checks and balances in place.
LA
Lawrence 1 year ago
↳ replying to Noemi
User 3: Collusion can be a big risk if employees have too much power without oversight.
NO
Novella 1 year ago
↳ replying to Noemi
User 2: I think it's important to have those policies in place to protect against insider threats.
MA
Margurite 1 year ago
↳ replying to Noemi
User 1: Yes, you're right! Job rotation and separation of duties help prevent collusion.
DO
Donte 1 year ago
Phishing? Nice try, but that's all about tricking users, not something that organizational policies can prevent.
JA
Jacqueline 1 year ago
↳ replying to Donte
B) Eavesdropping
BL
Blondell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Donte
A) Collusion
AL
Alecia 2 years ago
Ha! Eavesdropping? Not a chance. Job rotation and separation of duties can't do much against someone listening in on your conversations.
GI
Giovanna 2 years ago
Hmm, I thought this was about network security. Buffer overflow? Really? That's more about software vulnerabilities, not organizational policies.
LA
Lavelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Giovanna
A) Collusion
MA
Marjory 1 year ago
↳ replying to Giovanna
Yeah, it does. I think the answer is A) Collusion.
AL
Alpha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Giovanna
D) Phishing
IV
Ivette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Giovanna
C) Buffer overflow
AN
Annabelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Giovanna
B) Eavesdropping
JA
Jaclyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Giovanna
A) Collusion
DO
Dona 1 year ago
↳ replying to Giovanna
I agree, buffer overflow seems out of place here.
BE
Beth 1 year ago
↳ replying to Giovanna
D) Phishing
CH
Chanel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Giovanna
C) Buffer overflow
JO
Jordan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Giovanna
B) Eavesdropping
PA
Paz 1 year ago
↳ replying to Giovanna
A) Collusion
DE
Destiny 2 years ago
Collusion, definitely! Job rotation and separation of duties make it harder for employees to collude and carry out fraudulent activities.
MA
Matthew 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it makes sense. Collusion can be prevented by dividing responsibilities.
LI
Lilli 2 years ago
I agree with Ben, job rotation and separation of duties can prevent collusion.
BE
Ben 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Collusion.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel