New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISC2 CCSP Exam - Topic 12 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISC2's CCSP exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 12
[All CCSP Questions]

Limits for resource utilization can be set at different levels within a cloud environment to ensure that no particular entity can consume a level of resources that impacts other cloud customers.

Which of the following is NOT a unit covered by limits?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The hypervisor level, as a backend cloud infrastructure component, is not a unit where limits may be applied to control resource utilization. Limits can be placed at the service, virtual machine, and cloud customer levels within a cloud environment.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jaclyn
4 months ago
I think the answer is A, hypervisor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
4 months ago
Definitely, service limits are a thing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? I thought hypervisors had some limits too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
4 months ago
Totally agree, hypervisors are not usually limited.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
4 months ago
Limits can be set for cloud customers and VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
5 months ago
I recall limits being applied to customers and services, but I can't quite remember if hypervisors were included. This is tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused here. I thought all these options could have limits, but maybe the hypervisor is the odd one out?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
5 months ago
This question feels familiar! I practiced something similar where we discussed resource limits, and I think the hypervisor might not be a unit for limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
5 months ago
I think I remember that limits are usually set at the customer or VM level, but I'm not sure about the hypervisor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
5 months ago
Based on the question, I'd say the key is ensuring high availability and failover support. The redundant WLC and controller high availability pair options seem like the best choices to meet those needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we need to update the calendars, but I'm not sure if those are the right options. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
5 months ago
I think the answer is A. The code looks like it's creating a VRF object within a tenant object, which seems to be the correct way to create a VRF in ACI using the Cobra SDK.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards A because I feel like EOS doesn't use traditional Linux paths, but I really don't remember clearly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
5 months ago
Ah, I see. The get service is designed to return all matching records, not just one. So option D is the right answer. Thanks for the clarification!
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel