MENU
Limits for resource utilization can be set at different levels within a cloud environment to ensure that no particular entity can consume a level of resources that impacts other cloud customers.
Which of the following is NOT a unit covered by limits?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CCSP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
The hypervisor level, as a backend cloud infrastructure component, is not a unit where limits may be applied to control resource utilization. Limits can be placed at the service, virtual machine, and cloud customer levels within a cloud environment.
14 comments · newest first
JA
Jaclyn
11 months ago
I think the answer is A, hypervisor.
DE
Delisa
11 months ago
Definitely, service limits are a thing!
SH
Shalon
12 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? I thought hypervisors had some limits too.
LO
Loren
12 months ago
Totally agree, hypervisors are not usually limited.
DA
Darrel
12 months ago
Limits can be set for cloud customers and VMs.
UN
Una
1 year ago
I recall limits being applied to customers and services, but I can't quite remember if hypervisors were included. This is tricky!
AN
Annelle
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused here. I thought all these options could have limits, but maybe the hypervisor is the odd one out?
SH
Shalon
1 year ago
This question feels familiar! I practiced something similar where we discussed resource limits, and I think the hypervisor might not be a unit for limits.
EV
Evangelina
1 year ago
I think I remember that limits are usually set at the customer or VM level, but I'm not sure about the hypervisor.
TA
Tawanna
1 year ago
Based on the question, I'd say the key is ensuring high availability and failover support. The redundant WLC and controller high availability pair options seem like the best choices to meet those needs.
MA
Marsha
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we need to update the calendars, but I'm not sure if those are the right options. I'll have to think it through carefully.
CH
Christa
1 year ago
I think the answer is A. The code looks like it's creating a VRF object within a tenant object, which seems to be the correct way to create a VRF in ACI using the Cobra SDK.
TU
Tuyet
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards A because I feel like EOS doesn't use traditional Linux paths, but I really don't remember clearly!
MA
Marge
1 year ago
Ah, I see. The get service is designed to return all matching records, not just one. So option D is the right answer. Thanks for the clarification!