MENU
Which of the following is MOST helpful when prioritizing action plans for identified risk?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CRISC Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
WI
Wilbert
10 months ago
Surprised that appetite is even a thing in this context!
TW
Twana
11 months ago
Ranking by likelihood makes sense, but is it enough?
FE
Felice
11 months ago
Cost of controls should definitely be a factor too.
BR
Brent
11 months ago
I think getting input from business units is more effective.
ER
Erinn
11 months ago
Comparing risk rating against appetite is key!
AN
Annamae
12 months ago
Ranking the risk based on likelihood of occurrence sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it was the top priority in our studies.
JA
Jacob
12 months ago
I feel like determining the cost of controls could be relevant, but it seems more like a secondary consideration to me.
AD
Adelle
12 months ago
I remember a practice question where obtaining input from business units was emphasized. That might be key for prioritizing.
RU
Rutha
1 year ago
I think comparing risk rating against appetite is important, but I'm not sure if it's the most helpful.
FL
Florinda
1 year ago
Ranking the risks by likelihood is useful, but I'm not sure that's the MOST helpful factor here. I'd lean more towards comparing the risk rating to the organization's stated risk appetite to really prioritize the action plans effectively.
EU
Eura
1 year ago
Determining the cost of controls is an important consideration, but I don't think it's the MOST helpful factor in prioritizing action plans. The risk rating versus appetite feels like the key piece of information to focus on.
LI
Linwood
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I think getting input from the business units could also be really helpful to understand the context and impact of the risks. But I'm not totally sure which option is the MOST helpful.
AL
Allene
1 year ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'd focus on comparing the risk rating against the organization's risk appetite - that seems like the most direct way to prioritize action plans.
LA
Laurel
1 year ago
I think the answer is B, but I'm not 100% confident. I'll make sure to double-check my work before submitting.
BE
Bettyann
1 year ago
I'll have to go with option A. It's like choosing the flavor of ice cream - you need to know your appetite before you can decide which one to get!
MI
Mignon
1 year ago
Yes, knowing the appetite for risk is crucial in determining the most helpful action plan.
EL
Ellsworth
1 year ago
I agree, option A is key for prioritizing action plans based on identified risks.
JA
Jaleesa
1 year ago
Option A is definitely the way to go. It's all about understanding the appetite for risk.
TA
Tanesha
1 year ago
Option D is the way to go! Ranking risks based on likelihood is the foundation for any good risk management strategy. The other options are just secondary considerations.
MI
Mitzie
1 year ago
Yes, ranking risks by likelihood helps us address the most critical issues first.
AL
Aliza
1 year ago
I agree, it's important to focus on the most probable risks first.
MI
Miesha
1 year ago
Option D is definitely the best choice. Prioritizing based on likelihood is key.
CA
Candida
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option C seems more practical to me. Knowing the cost of controls is important to make informed decisions and allocate resources effectively.
CH
Chauncey
1 year ago
Yes, prioritizing action plans based on the cost of controls can definitely help in effective resource allocation.
GL
Glenna
1 year ago
I agree, understanding the cost of controls helps in making informed decisions.
GA
Garry
1 year ago
Option C does seem practical. Knowing the cost of controls is crucial for resource allocation.
AH
Ahmed
1 year ago
I would go with option B. Getting input from the business units is crucial to understand the true impact of the risks and how they should be addressed.
LE
Leontine
1 year ago
Comparing risk rating against appetite is definitely the most helpful in prioritizing action plans. It gives you a clear picture of how much risk the organization is willing to accept.
JO
Jordan
1 year ago
B) Obtaining input from business units
BR
Bronwyn
1 year ago
A) Comparing risk rating against appetite
CA
Carlota
1 year ago
I prefer C) Determining cost of controls to mitigate risk. It's important to consider financial implications.
SU
Susana
2 years ago
I agree with Jerilyn. It helps in aligning actions with organizational goals.
JE
Jerilyn
2 years ago
I think A) Comparing risk rating against appetite is the most helpful.