New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Isaca CRISC Exam - Topic 1 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's CRISC exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 1
[All CRISC Questions]

Which of the following observations from a third-party service provider review would be of GREATEST concern to a risk practitioner?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Denise at Sep 10, 2024, 11:24 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRISC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nickolas
3 months ago
Service contract renewal in 30 days is just a routine thing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
3 months ago
New personnel could mean instability, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
3 months ago
Wait, are the charges really higher than industry norms?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherrie
4 months ago
Totally agree, that’s a major concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
4 months ago
SLAs not being met is a huge red flag!
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
4 months ago
I recall discussing how contract renewals can lead to vulnerabilities, so option B might be concerning too, but I’m leaning towards A being the most critical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
4 months ago
I feel like option D about the service charges could be a red flag, but I’m not entirely sure how that impacts risk directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I remember a practice question where personnel changes were highlighted as a risk. So, option C could also be significant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
5 months ago
I think option A might be the biggest concern since unmet SLAs can indicate poor performance and risk to our operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
5 months ago
The high service charges seem like a potential issue, but I'm not sure that would be the GREATEST concern. It could just be an isolated pricing problem rather than a broader risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
5 months ago
I think the personnel changes are the most worrying. Losing key third-party staff could mean loss of institutional knowledge and increased operational risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
5 months ago
I'm not sure, the service contract renewal deadline seems pretty concerning to me. That could signal potential disruption or renegotiation of terms, which could introduce new risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'd say the SLA issue is probably the biggest red flag for a risk practitioner. Failing to meet service level agreements could indicate broader problems with the provider's reliability and performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
5 months ago
Yep, I agree with Emily. Fact tables are where the numeric values are stored, so that's the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
1 year ago
Higher service charges than industry norms? That's just plain old financial risk. Better keep the bean counters happy!
upvoted 0 times
Rozella
1 year ago
C) Key third-party personnel have recently been replaced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
1 year ago
B) The service contract is up for renewal in less than thirty days.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
1 year ago
A) Service level agreements (SLAs) have not been met over the last quarter.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lonna
1 year ago
Service level agreements not met? That's like ordering a pizza and it never shows up - unacceptable!
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
1 year ago
That's true, but I think the financial aspect is more critical for risk management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
1 year ago
Key personnel changes? That's a red flag for me. Consistency and expertise are so important with third-party providers.
upvoted 0 times
Donte
1 year ago
D) Monthly service charges are significantly higher than industry norms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
1 year ago
C) Key third-party personnel have recently been replaced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mayra
1 year ago
B) The service contract is up for renewal in less than thirty days.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
1 year ago
A) Service level agreements (SLAs) have not been met over the last quarter.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ettie
1 year ago
Hmm, the contract renewal in less than 30 days is pretty worrying too. Who knows what changes the provider might try to make? Better keep a close eye on that.
upvoted 0 times
Vinnie
1 year ago
C) Key third-party personnel have recently been replaced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
1 year ago
A) Service level agreements (SLAs) have not been met over the last quarter.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jonelle
1 year ago
But what about the key third-party personnel being replaced? That could also lead to disruptions in service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
1 year ago
I agree with Renay. It could indicate potential financial instability or inefficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
1 year ago
I think the observation about monthly service charges being significantly higher than industry norms would be the greatest concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
1 year ago
I think the service level agreements (SLAs) not being met is the most concerning. That could mean major disruptions in service, which is a huge risk for the business.
upvoted 0 times
Monte
1 year ago
C) Key third-party personnel have recently been replaced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pura
1 year ago
A) Service level agreements (SLAs) have not been met over the last quarter.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel