Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca CRISC Exam - Topic 1 Question 83 Discussion

Posted by Denise on Sep 10, 2024 at 11:24 AM

Which of the following observations from a third-party service provider review would be of GREATEST concern to a risk practitioner?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium CRISC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
NI
Nickolas 10 months ago
Service contract renewal in 30 days is just a routine thing.
JE
Jesus 11 months ago
New personnel could mean instability, right?
KA
Kasandra 11 months ago
Wait, are the charges really higher than industry norms?
CH
Cherrie 11 months ago
Totally agree, that’s a major concern.
ER
Erick 11 months ago
SLAs not being met is a huge red flag!
SA
Salley 12 months ago
I recall discussing how contract renewals can lead to vulnerabilities, so option B might be concerning too, but I’m leaning towards A being the most critical.
MI
Micheal 12 months ago
I feel like option D about the service charges could be a red flag, but I’m not entirely sure how that impacts risk directly.
MA
Marleen 12 months ago
I'm not sure, but I remember a practice question where personnel changes were highlighted as a risk. So, option C could also be significant.
OL
Oliva 1 year ago
I think option A might be the biggest concern since unmet SLAs can indicate poor performance and risk to our operations.
OM
Omer 1 year ago
The high service charges seem like a potential issue, but I'm not sure that would be the GREATEST concern. It could just be an isolated pricing problem rather than a broader risk.
BO
Bonita 1 year ago
I think the personnel changes are the most worrying. Losing key third-party staff could mean loss of institutional knowledge and increased operational risk.
FA
Fannie 1 year ago
I'm not sure, the service contract renewal deadline seems pretty concerning to me. That could signal potential disruption or renegotiation of terms, which could introduce new risks.
LA
Laquita 1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'd say the SLA issue is probably the biggest red flag for a risk practitioner. Failing to meet service level agreements could indicate broader problems with the provider's reliability and performance.
MO
Mozell 1 year ago
Yep, I agree with Emily. Fact tables are where the numeric values are stored, so that's the right answer here.
MA
Mariko 2 years ago
Higher service charges than industry norms? That's just plain old financial risk. Better keep the bean counters happy!
RO
Rozella 2 years ago
↳ replying to Mariko
C) Key third-party personnel have recently been replaced.
LA
Lamonica 2 years ago
↳ replying to Mariko
B) The service contract is up for renewal in less than thirty days.
SA
Salome 2 years ago
↳ replying to Mariko
A) Service level agreements (SLAs) have not been met over the last quarter.
LO
Lonna 2 years ago
Service level agreements not met? That's like ordering a pizza and it never shows up - unacceptable!
RE
Renay 2 years ago
That's true, but I think the financial aspect is more critical for risk management.
KI
Kimberely 2 years ago
Key personnel changes? That's a red flag for me. Consistency and expertise are so important with third-party providers.
DO
Donte 2 years ago
↳ replying to Kimberely
D) Monthly service charges are significantly higher than industry norms.
RA
Raul 2 years ago
↳ replying to Kimberely
C) Key third-party personnel have recently been replaced.
MA
Mayra 2 years ago
↳ replying to Kimberely
B) The service contract is up for renewal in less than thirty days.
AS
Ashleigh 2 years ago
↳ replying to Kimberely
A) Service level agreements (SLAs) have not been met over the last quarter.
ET
Ettie 2 years ago
Hmm, the contract renewal in less than 30 days is pretty worrying too. Who knows what changes the provider might try to make? Better keep a close eye on that.
VI
Vinnie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ettie
C) Key third-party personnel have recently been replaced.
DU
Dustin 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ettie
A) Service level agreements (SLAs) have not been met over the last quarter.
JO
Jonelle 2 years ago
But what about the key third-party personnel being replaced? That could also lead to disruptions in service.
AL
Alita 2 years ago
I agree with Renay. It could indicate potential financial instability or inefficiency.
RE
Renay 2 years ago
I think the observation about monthly service charges being significantly higher than industry norms would be the greatest concern.
MA
Marguerita 2 years ago
I think the service level agreements (SLAs) not being met is the most concerning. That could mean major disruptions in service, which is a huge risk for the business.
MO
Monte 2 years ago
↳ replying to Marguerita
C) Key third-party personnel have recently been replaced.
PU
Pura 2 years ago
↳ replying to Marguerita
A) Service level agreements (SLAs) have not been met over the last quarter.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel