Isaca COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Exam - Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's COBIT-Design-and-Implementation exam

Question #: 16
Topic #: 1

[All COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Questions]

Which of the following is the BEST approach to resolve competing priorities for the design of a governance system?

ABase the design on initiatives that will yield the most immediate benefit for the enterprise.

BDefer to risk and assurance management to determine priorities.

CUtilize generic, pre-programmed computations to generate quantitative priorities for governance objectives.

DInclude all key stakeholders in the discussion of the design.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

The best approach to resolving competing priorities for the design of a governance system is to include all key stakeholders in the discussion of the design. This approach ensures that diverse perspectives are considered and that priorities are aligned with the overall strategic goals of the enterprise.

Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:

COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, MEA04 (Managed Stakeholder Engagement): This objective emphasizes the importance of engaging stakeholders to ensure that their needs and priorities are addressed.

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3: This chapter discusses the value of stakeholder involvement in the governance design process to achieve consensus and align priorities.

Involving key stakeholders in the discussion helps to balance different priorities and ensures that the governance system design reflects a broad range of insights and objectives.

by Chi at Dec 07, 2024, 02:44 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Clare

3 months ago

D is nice in theory, but will everyone actually agree?

upvoted 0 times

...

Melissa

3 months ago

C seems too generic, how can that really work?

upvoted 0 times

...

Aracelis

3 months ago

B is the way to go, risk management knows best!

upvoted 0 times

...

Willodean

4 months ago

A sounds good for quick wins, but is it sustainable?

upvoted 0 times

...

Stanton

4 months ago

I think including all key stakeholders is crucial!

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheridan

4 months ago

I feel like using pre-programmed computations could be too rigid. Governance needs a more nuanced approach, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyssa

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question where immediate benefits were emphasized, but I wonder if that might overlook long-term goals.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimberely

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think deferring to risk management could be a safe choice. It seems like they would have the best insight on priorities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nada

5 months ago

I remember studying that involving stakeholders can really help in understanding different perspectives, so I might lean towards option D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosendo

5 months ago

Utilizing quantitative computations to prioritize governance objectives could be interesting, but I'm not sure how reliable that would be. I'll need to weigh that option carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roselle

5 months ago

Basing the design on initiatives with the most immediate benefit sounds tempting, but I'm not sure that's the best long-term approach. I'll have to think this through.

upvoted 0 times

...

Royal

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the wording of these choices. Maybe I should review the material again before deciding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glendora

5 months ago

Including all key stakeholders seems like the most comprehensive way to address competing priorities. I'll go with option D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anglea

5 months ago

This is a tricky one. I'll need to carefully weigh the pros and cons of each approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arletta

1 year ago

Haha, D - the more the merrier! Unless we're talking about office potlucks, then I'm keeping my distance.

upvoted 0 times

Erick

1 year ago

D) Include all key stakeholders in the discussion of the design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonora

1 year ago

C) Utilize generic, pre-programmed computations to generate quantitative priorities for governance objectives.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alethea

1 year ago

B) Defer to risk and assurance management to determine priorities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawna

1 year ago

A) Base the design on initiatives that will yield the most immediate benefit for the enterprise.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merrilee

1 year ago

Generic computations? No way, Jose! D is the answer, hands down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jovita

1 year ago

A might work in the short term, but D is the long-term solution. Can't skip the important people.

upvoted 0 times

Mari

1 year ago

A might work in the short term, but D is the long-term solution. Can't skip the important people.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaun

1 year ago

D) Include all key stakeholders in the discussion of the design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kattie

1 year ago

A) Base the design on initiatives that will yield the most immediate benefit for the enterprise.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephanie

1 year ago

C sounds too robotic. I prefer D - get those stakeholders in the room!

upvoted 0 times

...

Julieta

1 year ago

I see your point, Audrie. Prioritizing initiatives that provide immediate benefits can also be a valid approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audrie

1 year ago

I believe A) Base the design on initiatives that will yield the most immediate benefit for the enterprise is the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Desire

1 year ago

I'm partial to B. Risk and assurance management know what's really important.

upvoted 0 times

Shalon

1 year ago

A) Base the design on initiatives that will yield the most immediate benefit for the enterprise.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentine

1 year ago

B) I agree, involving all stakeholders is crucial for a successful governance system.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nu

1 year ago

D) Include all key stakeholders in the discussion of the design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Salley

1 year ago

B) Defer to risk and assurance management to determine priorities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rory

1 year ago

I agree with Elza. It's important to involve all stakeholders to ensure their perspectives are considered.

upvoted 0 times

...

Staci

1 year ago

D is the way to go! Involving all stakeholders is crucial for a well-rounded governance system.

upvoted 0 times

Irma

1 year ago

In the end, a governance system that considers all perspectives is more likely to be successful and effective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashlyn

1 year ago

It also allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the organization's needs and priorities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefania

1 year ago

Definitely, it helps to create a sense of ownership and buy-in for the governance system.

upvoted 0 times

...

Samuel

1 year ago

I agree, involving all stakeholders ensures that everyone's needs and concerns are taken into account.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elza

1 year ago

I think D) Include all key stakeholders in the discussion of the design is the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...