MENU
Which of the following is the BEST approach to resolve competing priorities for the design of a governance system?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
The best approach to resolving competing priorities for the design of a governance system is to include all key stakeholders in the discussion of the design. This approach ensures that diverse perspectives are considered and that priorities are aligned with the overall strategic goals of the enterprise.
Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, MEA04 (Managed Stakeholder Engagement): This objective emphasizes the importance of engaging stakeholders to ensure that their needs and priorities are addressed.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3: This chapter discusses the value of stakeholder involvement in the governance design process to achieve consensus and align priorities.
Involving key stakeholders in the discussion helps to balance different priorities and ensures that the governance system design reflects a broad range of insights and objectives.
39 comments · newest first
CL
Clare
10 months ago
D is nice in theory, but will everyone actually agree?
ME
Melissa
11 months ago
C seems too generic, how can that really work?
AR
Aracelis
11 months ago
B is the way to go, risk management knows best!
WI
Willodean
11 months ago
A sounds good for quick wins, but is it sustainable?
ST
Stanton
11 months ago
I think including all key stakeholders is crucial!
SH
Sheridan
12 months ago
I feel like using pre-programmed computations could be too rigid. Governance needs a more nuanced approach, right?
AL
Alyssa
12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where immediate benefits were emphasized, but I wonder if that might overlook long-term goals.
KI
Kimberely
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think deferring to risk management could be a safe choice. It seems like they would have the best insight on priorities.
NA
Nada
1 year ago
I remember studying that involving stakeholders can really help in understanding different perspectives, so I might lean towards option D.
RO
Rosendo
1 year ago
Utilizing quantitative computations to prioritize governance objectives could be interesting, but I'm not sure how reliable that would be. I'll need to weigh that option carefully.
RO
Roselle
1 year ago
Basing the design on initiatives with the most immediate benefit sounds tempting, but I'm not sure that's the best long-term approach. I'll have to think this through.
RO
Royal
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of these choices. Maybe I should review the material again before deciding.
GL
Glendora
1 year ago
Including all key stakeholders seems like the most comprehensive way to address competing priorities. I'll go with option D.
AN
Anglea
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to carefully weigh the pros and cons of each approach.
AR
Arletta
2 years ago
Haha, D - the more the merrier! Unless we're talking about office potlucks, then I'm keeping my distance.
ER
Erick
2 years ago
D) Include all key stakeholders in the discussion of the design.
LE
Leonora
2 years ago
C) Utilize generic, pre-programmed computations to generate quantitative priorities for governance objectives.
AL
Alethea
2 years ago
B) Defer to risk and assurance management to determine priorities.
SH
Shawna
2 years ago
A) Base the design on initiatives that will yield the most immediate benefit for the enterprise.
ME
Merrilee
2 years ago
Generic computations? No way, Jose! D is the answer, hands down.
JO
Jovita
2 years ago
A might work in the short term, but D is the long-term solution. Can't skip the important people.
MA
Mari
2 years ago
A might work in the short term, but D is the long-term solution. Can't skip the important people.
SH
Shaun
2 years ago
D) Include all key stakeholders in the discussion of the design.
KA
Kattie
2 years ago
A) Base the design on initiatives that will yield the most immediate benefit for the enterprise.
ST
Stephanie
2 years ago
C sounds too robotic. I prefer D - get those stakeholders in the room!
JU
Julieta
2 years ago
I see your point, Audrie. Prioritizing initiatives that provide immediate benefits can also be a valid approach.
AU
Audrie
2 years ago
I believe A) Base the design on initiatives that will yield the most immediate benefit for the enterprise is the best approach.
DE
Desire
2 years ago
I'm partial to B. Risk and assurance management know what's really important.
SH
Shalon
2 years ago
A) Base the design on initiatives that will yield the most immediate benefit for the enterprise.
VA
Valentine
2 years ago
B) I agree, involving all stakeholders is crucial for a successful governance system.
NU
Nu
2 years ago
D) Include all key stakeholders in the discussion of the design.
SA
Salley
2 years ago
B) Defer to risk and assurance management to determine priorities.
RO
Rory
2 years ago
I agree with Elza. It's important to involve all stakeholders to ensure their perspectives are considered.
ST
Staci
2 years ago
D is the way to go! Involving all stakeholders is crucial for a well-rounded governance system.
IR
Irma
2 years ago
In the end, a governance system that considers all perspectives is more likely to be successful and effective.
AS
Ashlyn
2 years ago
It also allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the organization's needs and priorities.
ST
Stefania
2 years ago
Definitely, it helps to create a sense of ownership and buy-in for the governance system.
SA
Samuel
2 years ago
I agree, involving all stakeholders ensures that everyone's needs and concerns are taken into account.
EL
Elza
2 years ago
I think D) Include all key stakeholders in the discussion of the design is the best approach.