New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca COBIT-2019 Exam - Topic 5 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's COBIT-2019 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 5
[All COBIT-2019 Questions]

When tailoring the COBIT organization structure to organizational context and priorities, which of the following should be done NEXT after mapping organizational structures with specific responsibility or accountability?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

According to the Official COBIT 2019 Study Manual from Isaca, the CIO and the program steering committee are responsible for performing a stakeholder satisfaction survey and gathering feedback on lessons learned from the implementation of an EGIT program plan. This includes gathering and evaluating information from the stakeholders, as well as assessing program objectives and performance and making any necessary adjustments to ensure that the program is successful.

The CIO is responsible for ensuring that the implementation of the program aligns with the overall IT strategy and that the program is effective in delivering the desired results. The program steering committee is responsible for providing oversight and guidance for the implementation of the program.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Mitsue
3 months ago
Agreed, A is the way to go for flexibility!
upvoted 0 times
...
Noelia
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about this? Sounds complicated!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
3 months ago
C seems a bit excessive, do we really need two more levels?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
4 months ago
I think B makes more sense, job descriptions are crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malissa
4 months ago
Definitely A, adapting roles is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
4 months ago
I recall a similar question where adapting roles was emphasized, so I’m leaning towards option A as the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brande
4 months ago
Adding levels for consulted and informed sounds familiar, but I feel like that might come later in the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about revising job descriptions being important. It might be the next step?
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
5 months ago
I think after mapping the structures, we should adapt the COBIT roles to fit our organization better. That seems to align with what we practiced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
5 months ago
Adding two levels of involvement for consulted and informed seems like a good strategy, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the correct next step here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iesha
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. After mapping the organizational structures, the next step is to adapt the COBIT roles and organizational structures to fit the specific context and priorities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the COBIT organizational structure guidelines to determine the appropriate next step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the context correctly before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The options seem a bit vague to me. I might need to think it through a bit more before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
5 months ago
I think this question is testing our understanding of how the Automated Administration and Elastic Resource Capacity patterns work together. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
9 months ago
Adapt the COBIT roles? Sounds like a job for a structural engineer and a circus acrobat. I hope they're not afraid of heights!
upvoted 0 times
Teddy
8 months ago
C) Add two levels of involvement for consulted and informed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
9 months ago
B) Revise the organizational hierarchy with job descriptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
9 months ago
A) Adapt the COBIT roles and organizational structures.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cecily
10 months ago
Adapting the COBIT roles? That's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. But hey, at least it's not as bad as trying to fit my entire department in there.
upvoted 0 times
Silvana
9 months ago
C) Add two levels of involvement for consulted and informed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
9 months ago
B) Revise the organizational hierarchy with job descriptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candida
10 months ago
Adding two levels of involvement? What is this, a game of organizational Twister? I'll stick to the basics, thanks.
upvoted 0 times
Cordie
8 months ago
I agree, keeping it simple is usually the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
8 months ago
C) Add two levels of involvement for consulted and informed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
9 months ago
B) Revise the organizational hierarchy with job descriptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
9 months ago
A) Adapt the COBIT roles and organizational structures.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Charlene
10 months ago
Revising the organizational hierarchy? That's a whole can of worms I'd rather not open. Let's stick to the COBIT framework and keep things simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
11 months ago
Adapt the COBIT roles and organizational structures? Sounds like the logical next step to me. No need to reinvent the wheel here.
upvoted 0 times
Shelton
10 months ago
B) Revise the organizational hierarchy with job descriptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
10 months ago
A) Adapt the COBIT roles and organizational structures.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joanna
11 months ago
I believe adding two levels of involvement for consulted and informed would also be beneficial for better communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
11 months ago
I agree with Josephine. It's important to align the roles with the organizational context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
11 months ago
I think we should adapt the COBIT roles and organizational structures next.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel