Isaca COBIT-2019 Exam - Topic 5 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's COBIT-2019 exam

Question #: 46
Topic #: 5

[All COBIT-2019 Questions]

Which of the following is the PRIMARY benefit or output derived from setting targeted capability levels and performing a capability-level gap analysis for selected processes?

AIdentification and mitigation of all identified risks

BIdentification of process improvement opportunities

CDevelopment of a business case outline

DDevelopment of enterprise goals that align to established targets

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

The primary benefit or output derived from setting targeted capability levels and performing a capability-level gap analysis for selected processes is the identification of process improvement opportunities, according to the official COBIT 2019 Study Manual from ISACA. This gap analysis can help to identify areas where processes are not meeting their desired capability levels and can provide insight into how processes can be improved to meet their desired levels. This can help to increase efficiency and reduce costs.

by Beatriz at Mar 10, 2024, 06:14 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium COBIT-2019 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Dannie

3 months ago

I’d go with B too, it’s all about finding those gaps!

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernadine

3 months ago

Wait, is it really just about improvement opportunities? Seems too simple.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kattie

3 months ago

A sounds good, but it’s not the primary focus here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jade

4 months ago

I think D makes more sense, aligning goals is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annabelle

4 months ago

Definitely B, process improvement is key!

upvoted 0 times

...

Skye

4 months ago

I recall a similar question where aligning enterprise goals was emphasized. Option D might be relevant, but I still think it’s more about improvement opportunities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Troy

4 months ago

I feel like developing a business case outline is more of a secondary outcome. So, I’m leaning towards option B as well, but I could be wrong.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noemi

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about risk identification being important. Maybe option A is the right answer?

upvoted 0 times

...

Alline

5 months ago

I think the primary benefit is about identifying process improvement opportunities, like option B. It seems to align with what we practiced in class.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pamela

5 months ago

I've got a good feeling about this one. Based on my understanding, the primary benefit of capability-level gap analysis is to identify process improvement opportunities. That seems to be the most direct and relevant answer choice here. I'll go with B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonna

5 months ago

This is a tricky one. I know capability-level gap analysis is important, but I'm not sure I fully understand how it ties to the specific benefits listed here. I may need to review my notes or ask the instructor for clarification before attempting to answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuriko

5 months ago

Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The question is asking about the primary benefit or output of setting targeted capability levels and performing a gap analysis. I think the key is to identify which option best captures the main purpose of this exercise. I'll carefully consider each choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catherin

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, and I'm not entirely clear on the difference between process improvement opportunities and business case development. I'll need to re-read the question and options closely.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daryl

5 months ago

This looks like a straightforward question about the benefits of capability-level gap analysis. I'll need to think through the options carefully, but I'm confident I can identify the primary benefit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maricela

5 months ago

I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Enabling flaky test detection is definitely the way to go. That will give us the insights we need to troubleshoot the inconsistent test outcomes and make sure the test logic is sound.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teddy

5 months ago

This seems like a pretty straightforward question about the Oracle database architecture. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jennifer

5 months ago

Service reusability seems related, but it sounds more like a different concept. I lean towards service abstraction since it specifically deals with hiding implementation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ligia

5 months ago

Okay, let me see here. I think the Catalyst 3560-CX and Catalyst 4500-E are the two products that are supported as "Extended" in DNA-C 1.1. I'm pretty confident about those two choices.

upvoted 0 times

...