MENU
When tailoring COBIT 2019 to enterprise requirements, which of the following is the PRIMARY objective of preparing a risk profile?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium COBIT-2019 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
According to Isaca COBIT 2019, the primary objective of preparing a risk profile is to identify areas of risk that exceed the risk appetite of the enterprise. This involves assessing the potential risks that the enterprise is exposed to, and determining if these risks exceed the level of risk that the enterprise is willing to accept. This helps the enterprise understand and prioritize the areas of risk that need to be addressed, and helps to ensure that appropriate measures are taken to mitigate these risks.
21 comments · newest first
ET
Ethan
10 months ago
Not sure if a risk profile really helps with all that.
DE
Denny
11 months ago
Wait, I thought it was mainly for tech disruptions?
LA
Latrice
11 months ago
Definitely agree with option D, risk appetite is key!
IZ
Izetta
11 months ago
I think it's more about business continuity impacts.
JE
Jerrod
11 months ago
It's all about identifying risks that need mitigation!
LU
Lucia
12 months ago
I seem to recall that identifying risks causing technology disruption was important too, but I don't think that's the primary objective. It feels like a secondary concern.
MI
Michal
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused. I thought the main goal was to identify areas of risk that require mitigation, but now I'm second-guessing myself after reviewing the options.
CH
Chandra
12 months ago
I remember practicing a question about risk profiles, and I feel like it was more about identifying risks that impact business continuity. That makes sense for enterprise requirements.
BA
Barrett
1 year ago
I think the primary objective is to identify areas of risk that exceed risk appetite, but I'm not entirely sure. It seems like a key focus in risk management.
ZO
Zona
1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The primary objective is to identify areas of risk that require mitigation, so I'm going to go with option A.
FR
Francine
1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. The key is to focus on the primary objective, which is to identify areas of risk that exceed the organization's risk appetite. That seems like the best answer to me.
JE
Jerry
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. Is the goal to identify areas of risk that cause technology disruption, or areas that impact business continuity? I'll need to think this through carefully.
CH
Chandra
1 year ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think the primary objective of preparing a risk profile is to identify areas of risk that require mitigation.
JA
Jaclyn
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully read through the code options and think about how each one handles the different schemas across the partitions.
MI
Mickie
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know stakeholder engagement is important, but I can't quite remember the specific risks off the top of my head.
LE
Lenny
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few different options presented, and I'm not entirely sure which one is the right approach. I'll need to think it through carefully.
RO
Rosina
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know honeypots are used for security purposes, but I'm not entirely confident that's the right answer. I'll have to think it through a bit more.
CL
Clemencia
2 years ago
That's true, Roslyn. We need to know which risks are too high for us to accept.
RO
Roslyn
2 years ago
I believe it's also important to identify areas of risk that exceed risk appetite.
NI
Nieves
2 years ago
I agree with Clemencia. Mitigating risks is crucial for ensuring smooth operations.
CL
Clemencia
2 years ago
I think the primary objective is to identify areas of risk that require mitigation.