Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca COBIT-2019 Exam - Topic 4 Question 33 Discussion

Which of the following should be scheduled for completion FIRST when prioritizing improvement initiatives?
B) Initiatives that are easiest to achieve and will garner business benefits
A) Initiatives that are the least expensive in order to lower risk due to failure
C) Initiatives with the lowest cost regardless of expected business value

Isaca COBIT-2019 Exam - Topic 4 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's COBIT-2019 exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 4
[All COBIT-2019 Questions]

Which of the following should be scheduled for completion FIRST when prioritizing improvement initiatives?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Claudio
8 months ago
Not sure about C, seems like a bad idea overall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
8 months ago
Wait, why would cost be prioritized over value?
upvoted 0 times
...
Han
9 months ago
A is a safer bet though, less risk involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
9 months ago
Totally agree, easy wins first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
9 months ago
I think B makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
9 months ago
I’m confused about option C. It mentions the lowest cost, but I’m not sure if that’s really the best approach if it doesn’t provide value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
9 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a question similar to this before, and it was about focusing on business benefits. So, I might lean towards option B again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about balancing cost and value. Maybe option A is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
9 months ago
I think we should prioritize initiatives that are easiest to achieve first, like option B. It seems to make the most sense for quick wins.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
9 months ago
Hmm, this one seems a bit tricky. I'll need to think through each option carefully to make sure I don't miss anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
9 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the images and think through the logic step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jannette
9 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know Palo Alto firewalls use a specialized hardware architecture, so I'm guessing the "Parallel Processing Hardware" is one of the components. And they probably have some kind of optimized network processing engine as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few options that seem plausible, but I'm not sure which one would be considered the "BEST" indicator of risk assessment. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel