Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca COBIT-2019 Exam - Topic 3 Question 13 Discussion

Posted by Dick on May 05, 2022 at 10:12 AM

What is the KEY benefit of considering the size of the enterprise when designing governance?

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium COBIT-2019 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
BL
Blythe 11 months ago
Totally agree with B, COBIT is key for larger firms!
AL
Alethea 12 months ago
D seems too specific, I’d go with A or B.
AS
Ashlee 12 months ago
Surprised that people overlook A, it’s crucial!
KA
Kanisha 12 months ago
I think C is more important for prioritizing.
FI
Filiberto 1 year ago
Definitely B, size matters for guidance!
VA
Valentin 1 year ago
Targeting capability levels seems relevant too, but I wonder if it really ties back to the size of the enterprise as a primary factor.
RO
Ronald 1 year ago
I feel like identifying the implementation effort is important, but it might not be the key benefit we're looking for in this context.
TA
Tandra 1 year ago
I remember a practice question that emphasized prioritizing governance objectives based on enterprise size, so maybe that's the key benefit here?
CH
Chan 1 year ago
I think the size of the enterprise helps in determining whether to use COBIT or SME guidance, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the main benefit.
MA
Marvel 1 year ago
I'm a little confused by this question. The wording is a bit technical, and I'm not sure if I fully understand the difference between the options. I'll have to review my notes and try to figure out the best answer.
PA
Pamella 1 year ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to determine which economy had a healthier current account situation. Wasn't it about looking at the deficit as a percentage of GDP?
DA
Dante 1 year ago
I think the key here is understanding that the Security Policy rule takes precedence over the Security Profile action. So if it's an allow rule, the Security Profile action is applied last. If it's a block rule, the Security Policy rule action is applied last. I'm going with option B.
AL
Alexia 1 year ago
Hmm, I think the key here is the `--secure` flag. That should enable encryption, but I'll need to double-check the documentation to be sure.
SA
Salome 1 year ago
I remember a practice question about accruals and deferrals. Wasn't there something specific about matching costs to revenue in the correct periods?
TA
Tayna 1 year ago
Wait, is this a trick question? Prioritizing objectives sounds like the most practical benefit to me. But hey, at least they didn't include an option about 'making coffee for the board'.
TA
Tashia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tayna
C) Assigning priorities to governance and management objectives
YA
Yasuko 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tayna
B) Determining whether COBIT or SME focus area guidance should be used
RY
Ryan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tayna
A) Identifying the implementation effort needed to finalize the design phase
JA
James 1 year ago
Targeting capability levels of governance and management objectives based on enterprise size - that's a clever idea! Option D might be the way to go.
HA
Hannah 1 year ago
↳ replying to James
Definitely, it allows for a more tailored approach to governance and management objectives.
KI
Kimbery 1 year ago
↳ replying to James
Yes, it can make the process more efficient and effective.
LE
Lettie 1 year ago
↳ replying to James
I agree, targeting capability levels based on enterprise size can really help in designing governance.
LE
Lezlie 1 year ago
I'm not sure COBIT or SME focus area guidance is the key benefit here. Wouldn't prioritizing the governance and management objectives be more important? I'm leaning towards Option C.
DO
Dominic 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lezlie
Determining whether to use COBIT or SME focus area guidance depends on the size of the enterprise.
DW
Dwight 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lezlie
Identifying the implementation effort needed is also crucial in finalizing the design phase.
BE
Bea 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lezlie
Option C is important because it helps in assigning priorities to governance and management objectives.
AL
Alyssa 1 year ago
Hmm, the size of the enterprise definitely impacts the effort needed to implement the governance design. Option A seems like a reasonable choice.
AN
Annice 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alyssa
True, choosing the right guidance based on enterprise size is crucial.
ST
Stephen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alyssa
Option B) Determining whether COBIT or SME focus area guidance should be used
FE
Felix 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alyssa
I agree, the size of the enterprise plays a big role in determining the effort required.
NO
Noel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alyssa
Option A) Identifying the implementation effort needed to finalize the design phase
BE
Bettina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alyssa
True, choosing the right focus area guidance is crucial for effective governance.
AN
Angelyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alyssa
Option B) Determining whether COBIT or SME focus area guidance should be used
MA
Marguerita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alyssa
I agree, the size of the enterprise plays a big role in determining the effort required.
NI
Nichelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alyssa
Option A) Identifying the implementation effort needed to finalize the design phase
RE
Renato 1 year ago
I believe assigning priorities to governance and management objectives is also important based on the size of the enterprise.
AL
Allene 1 year ago
I agree with Rasheeda. Considering the size of the enterprise helps in choosing the right framework for governance.
RA
Rasheeda 2 years ago
I think the key benefit is determining whether COBIT or SME focus area guidance should be used.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel