Isaca COBIT-2019 Exam - Topic 2 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's COBIT-2019 exam

Question #: 62
Topic #: 2

[All COBIT-2019 Questions]

Who is accountable for monitoring the performance of the execution of an EGIT implementation program plan against success metrics and adjusting long-term targets when necessary?

ABoard of directors

BIT process owners

CIT audit department

DCIO

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

According to the ISACA COBIT 2019 Framework, the Board of Directors is responsible for monitoring the performance of the execution of an EGIT implementation program plan against success metrics and adjusting long-term targets when necessary. This is specified in Domain 4, Objective 4.1: 'Establish and govern the enterprise governance of IT (EGIT)'. The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that the EGIT implementation program plan is executed according to the organization's objectives and in alignment with the enterprise strategy. Additionally, the Board of Directors is responsible for monitoring the EGIT program's progress and making adjustments when necessary.

by Viki at Sep 17, 2024, 07:29 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium COBIT-2019 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Ashlyn

3 months ago

Sounds like a mix of responsibilities to me!

upvoted 0 times

...

Vilma

3 months ago

Really? I thought it was the IT audit department's role.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carisa

3 months ago

Wait, isn't that more of the board's job?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tasia

4 months ago

Totally agree, the CIO should be the one monitoring.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dudley

4 months ago

I think the CIO is usually responsible for that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronny

4 months ago

This seems similar to a question we did on governance frameworks, where the board had the final say, but I wonder if the CIO has a more active role in this context.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecil

4 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the roles; I thought IT process owners were more involved in execution rather than monitoring performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeanna

4 months ago

I remember a practice question where the CIO was mentioned as key in overseeing IT initiatives, so I’m leaning towards option D.

upvoted 0 times

...

James

5 months ago

I think the board of directors might be responsible for overall accountability, but I'm not entirely sure if they handle the day-to-day monitoring.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaniqua

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the terminology in this question. Is "EGIT" referring to some specific IT governance framework? I'll need to review my notes to see if I can figure out the right answer here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evangelina

5 months ago

Okay, I've got this. Based on my understanding of IT governance, the IT audit department would be responsible for monitoring the performance of the EGIT implementation and adjusting targets as necessary. They provide independent oversight.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alease

5 months ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I think it's asking about who is responsible for monitoring the progress of an IT governance program and adjusting long-term goals as needed. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

5 months ago

This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key terms like "EGIT implementation program plan" and "success metrics" before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nohemi

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different types of patches mentioned. I'll need to review my notes on Oracle patch management to make sure I understand the differences.

upvoted 0 times

...