I'm a little unsure on this one. I feel like all the options are important for IT governance, but if I had to choose the most critical one, I'd go with C. Executive sponsorship seems key to making IT governance actually work in practice.
Okay, let me think this through. I know IT governance is about aligning IT with business goals, so I'd say C is the most important - if it's not sponsored by executives, it's not going to be successfully implemented across the organization.
Ooh, this is a good question. I'm leaning towards B - identifying business risk seems like a core part of IT governance that would be essential for it to work properly. But I'm not 100% confident on that.
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not totally sure about the difference between the options, but I think C might be the best answer since IT governance needs to have executive-level support and sponsorship to be effective.
I think the key here is to focus on the word "imperative" - that means it's absolutely essential, so I'd look for the option that describes something that is critical or necessary for IT governance to be successful.
Mollie
1 month agoCarline
1 month agoJaclyn
2 months agoShaniqua
2 months agoLanie
2 months agoMichell
2 months agoDenny
2 months agoVirgina
2 months agoEden
3 months agoLenna
3 months agoMeghan
3 months agoKarima
4 months agoJosephine
4 months agoVashti
4 months agoFloyd
4 months agoMindy
4 months agoIvan
4 months agoScot
5 months agoJoanna
5 months agoJonell
5 months agoJame
5 months agoSantos
5 months agoAliza
6 months agoStephane
6 months agoEmogene
6 months agoFelix
20 days agoKristel
26 days agoTheodora
1 month agoGianna
5 months agoLigia
6 months ago