Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca CGEIT Exam - Topic 9 Question 62 Discussion

Posted by Sheron on Aug 08, 2023 at 09:12 AM

A board of directors wants to ensure the enterprise is responsive to changes in its environment that would directly impact critical business processes. Which of the following will BEST facilitate meeting this objective?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium CGEIT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
45 comments · newest first
MA
Mabel 11 months ago
Not sure if frequent threat analyses are enough on their own.
SH
Sharika 11 months ago
Wait, implementing a competitive intelligence tool? Really?
LU
Luann 11 months ago
Regularly reviewing risk appetite is important too, though.
RO
Rolf 11 months ago
Totally agree, KRIs keep you ahead of potential issues!
MA
Margo 12 months ago
I think monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) is crucial.
VA
Valentine 12 months ago
Implementing a competitive intelligence tool sounds interesting, but I wonder if it really addresses the responsiveness to environmental changes directly.
FI
Fidelia 12 months ago
I feel like regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite is crucial, but it might not be as proactive as the other options.
CL
Clarence 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember we discussed the importance of threat analyses in class. Maybe that's a strong option too?
CE
Celestina 1 year ago
I think monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) might be the best choice since they provide ongoing insights into potential risks.
PE
Penney 1 year ago
I think the "campus and remote site" and "design/deployment opportunities" options are less directly relevant to the question, so I'll probably skip those.
KA
Karon 1 year ago
Didn't we discuss that Denial of Service can affect blockchains? But I can't recall how Routing fits into that context. Maybe I'm mixing it up with traditional networks.
CH
Christiane 1 year ago
I think this might be the rolling budget method, where you adjust based on changing needs, right?
AR
Art 1 year ago
Competitive intelligence, huh? Sounds like the business version of corporate espionage. I'll stick with the good old-fashioned risk monitoring, thanks.
PR
Precious 1 year ago
Gotta love those KRIs - they're like the superheroes of risk management, always keeping an eye out for trouble!
RO
Roselle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Precious
D: Implementing a competitive intelligence tool could also provide valuable insights into external factors impacting our business processes.
WA
Wai 1 year ago
↳ replying to Precious
C: We should also consider regularly reviewing our risk appetite to ensure we are aligned with our objectives.
MO
Mona 1 year ago
↳ replying to Precious
B: Definitely, they help us stay proactive in managing threats.
LA
Lashanda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Precious
A: I agree, KRIs are essential for keeping track of potential risks.
LA
Lashonda 1 year ago
Threat analyses are important, but they're more reactive. I'd go with the option that focuses on proactive monitoring.
LE
Leslie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lashonda
C: Regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite could help us stay ahead of any potential threats.
BE
Bernardo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lashonda
B: I agree, it's important to be proactive in monitoring potential risks.
EL
Eleni 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lashonda
A: I think monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) would be the best option.
DI
Diane 1 year ago
Implementing a competitive intelligence tool could provide valuable insights, but it doesn't directly address the need to respond to changes in the environment.
VI
Viki 1 year ago
↳ replying to Diane
C: Regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite
QU
Quinn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Diane
B: Monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs)
BE
Bernadine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Diane
A: Scheduling frequent threat analyses
LY
Lyla 1 year ago
I think regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite is crucial. It helps ensure the organization is prepared to handle the identified risks.
GE
Gearldine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lyla
D: Implementing a competitive intelligence tool could provide valuable insights into external factors that may affect the organization.
MO
Mollie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lyla
D: Implementing a competitive intelligence tool can provide valuable insights into the external environment to anticipate changes.
NA
Nathan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lyla
C: Scheduling frequent threat analyses can help identify new risks that may impact critical business processes.
LA
Lacresha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lyla
C: Scheduling frequent threat analyses can help identify new risks that may impact critical business processes.
WH
Whitney 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lyla
B: Monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) is also important to stay ahead of potential threats.
PR
Princess 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lyla
B: Monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) is also important to stay ahead of any potential threats.
DE
Denise 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lyla
A: I agree, regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite is key to staying prepared.
LE
Leota 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lyla
User 2
KE
Kendra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lyla
A: I agree, regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite is key to staying prepared for potential risks.
MA
Marget 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lyla
User 1
SH
Sherman 1 year ago
I believe C) Regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite could also be a good option to consider.
RO
Robt 1 year ago
I agree with Katina, monitoring key risk indicators would help in staying responsive to changes.
JE
Jerilyn 2 years ago
Monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) seems like the most comprehensive approach to staying on top of changes that could impact critical processes.
AL
Allene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerilyn
D: Regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite is crucial for understanding the organization's tolerance for risk.
EU
Eura 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerilyn
C: Scheduling frequent threat analyses could also be helpful in identifying potential risks.
AR
Arlean 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerilyn
B: Agreed, it's important to keep a close eye on those indicators.
LA
Lashaunda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerilyn
A: I think monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) is the way to go.
KA
Katina 2 years ago
I think the answer is B) Monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs).
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel