Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Isaca CGEIT Exam - Topic 9 Question 62 Discussion

A board of directors wants to ensure the enterprise is responsive to changes in its environment that would directly impact critical business processes. Which of the following will BEST facilitate meeting this objective?
A) Scheduling frequent threat analyses
B) Monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs)
C) Regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite
D) Implementing a competitive intelligence tool

Isaca CGEIT Exam - Topic 9 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's CGEIT exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 9
[All CGEIT Questions]

A board of directors wants to ensure the enterprise is responsive to changes in its environment that would directly impact critical business processes. Which of the following will BEST facilitate meeting this objective?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Sheron at Aug 08, 2023, 09:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CGEIT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Mabel
8 months ago
Not sure if frequent threat analyses are enough on their own.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
8 months ago
Wait, implementing a competitive intelligence tool? Really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luann
8 months ago
Regularly reviewing risk appetite is important too, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
8 months ago
Totally agree, KRIs keep you ahead of potential issues!
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
9 months ago
I think monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
9 months ago
Implementing a competitive intelligence tool sounds interesting, but I wonder if it really addresses the responsiveness to environmental changes directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
9 months ago
I feel like regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite is crucial, but it might not be as proactive as the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarence
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember we discussed the importance of threat analyses in class. Maybe that's a strong option too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
9 months ago
I think monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) might be the best choice since they provide ongoing insights into potential risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
9 months ago
I think the "campus and remote site" and "design/deployment opportunities" options are less directly relevant to the question, so I'll probably skip those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
9 months ago
Didn't we discuss that Denial of Service can affect blockchains? But I can't recall how Routing fits into that context. Maybe I'm mixing it up with traditional networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
9 months ago
I think this might be the rolling budget method, where you adjust based on changing needs, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
1 year ago
Competitive intelligence, huh? Sounds like the business version of corporate espionage. I'll stick with the good old-fashioned risk monitoring, thanks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
1 year ago
Gotta love those KRIs - they're like the superheroes of risk management, always keeping an eye out for trouble!
upvoted 0 times
Roselle
1 year ago
D: Implementing a competitive intelligence tool could also provide valuable insights into external factors impacting our business processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wai
1 year ago
C: We should also consider regularly reviewing our risk appetite to ensure we are aligned with our objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
1 year ago
B: Definitely, they help us stay proactive in managing threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
1 year ago
A: I agree, KRIs are essential for keeping track of potential risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashonda
1 year ago
Threat analyses are important, but they're more reactive. I'd go with the option that focuses on proactive monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
Leslie
1 year ago
C: Regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite could help us stay ahead of any potential threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
1 year ago
B: I agree, it's important to be proactive in monitoring potential risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleni
1 year ago
A: I think monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Diane
1 year ago
Implementing a competitive intelligence tool could provide valuable insights, but it doesn't directly address the need to respond to changes in the environment.
upvoted 0 times
Viki
1 year ago
C: Regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite
upvoted 0 times
...
Quinn
1 year ago
B: Monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs)
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
1 year ago
A: Scheduling frequent threat analyses
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lyla
1 year ago
I think regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite is crucial. It helps ensure the organization is prepared to handle the identified risks.
upvoted 0 times
Gearldine
1 year ago
D: Implementing a competitive intelligence tool could provide valuable insights into external factors that may affect the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
1 year ago
D: Implementing a competitive intelligence tool can provide valuable insights into the external environment to anticipate changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
1 year ago
C: Scheduling frequent threat analyses can help identify new risks that may impact critical business processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
1 year ago
C: Scheduling frequent threat analyses can help identify new risks that may impact critical business processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
1 year ago
B: Monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) is also important to stay ahead of potential threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
1 year ago
B: Monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) is also important to stay ahead of any potential threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
1 year ago
A: I agree, regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite is key to staying prepared.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
1 year ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
1 year ago
A: I agree, regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite is key to staying prepared for potential risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
1 year ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherman
1 year ago
I believe C) Regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite could also be a good option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
1 year ago
I agree with Katina, monitoring key risk indicators would help in staying responsive to changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerilyn
1 year ago
Monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) seems like the most comprehensive approach to staying on top of changes that could impact critical processes.
upvoted 0 times
Allene
1 year ago
D: Regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite is crucial for understanding the organization's tolerance for risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
1 year ago
C: Scheduling frequent threat analyses could also be helpful in identifying potential risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
1 year ago
B: Agreed, it's important to keep a close eye on those indicators.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
1 year ago
A: I think monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katina
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) Monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs).
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel