Isaca CGEIT Exam - Topic 9 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's CGEIT exam

Question #: 62
Topic #: 9

A board of directors wants to ensure the enterprise is responsive to changes in its environment that would directly impact critical business processes. Which of the following will BEST facilitate meeting this objective?

AScheduling frequent threat analyses

BMonitoring key risk indicators (KRIs)

CRegularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite

DImplementing a competitive intelligence tool

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Sheron at Aug 08, 2023, 09:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CGEIT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Mabel

6 months ago

Not sure if frequent threat analyses are enough on their own.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharika

6 months ago

Wait, implementing a competitive intelligence tool? Really?

upvoted 0 times

...

Luann

7 months ago

Regularly reviewing risk appetite is important too, though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolf

7 months ago

Totally agree, KRIs keep you ahead of potential issues!

upvoted 0 times

...

Margo

7 months ago

I think monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentine

7 months ago

Implementing a competitive intelligence tool sounds interesting, but I wonder if it really addresses the responsiveness to environmental changes directly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fidelia

7 months ago

I feel like regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite is crucial, but it might not be as proactive as the other options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clarence

8 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember we discussed the importance of threat analyses in class. Maybe that's a strong option too?

upvoted 0 times

...

Celestina

8 months ago

I think monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) might be the best choice since they provide ongoing insights into potential risks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Penney

8 months ago

I think the "campus and remote site" and "design/deployment opportunities" options are less directly relevant to the question, so I'll probably skip those.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karon

8 months ago

Didn't we discuss that Denial of Service can affect blockchains? But I can't recall how Routing fits into that context. Maybe I'm mixing it up with traditional networks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Christiane

8 months ago

I think this might be the rolling budget method, where you adjust based on changing needs, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Art

1 year ago

Competitive intelligence, huh? Sounds like the business version of corporate espionage. I'll stick with the good old-fashioned risk monitoring, thanks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Precious

1 year ago

Gotta love those KRIs - they're like the superheroes of risk management, always keeping an eye out for trouble!

upvoted 0 times

Roselle

11 months ago

D: Implementing a competitive intelligence tool could also provide valuable insights into external factors impacting our business processes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wai

11 months ago

C: We should also consider regularly reviewing our risk appetite to ensure we are aligned with our objectives.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mona

12 months ago

B: Definitely, they help us stay proactive in managing threats.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashanda

12 months ago

A: I agree, KRIs are essential for keeping track of potential risks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashonda

1 year ago

Threat analyses are important, but they're more reactive. I'd go with the option that focuses on proactive monitoring.

upvoted 0 times

Leslie

11 months ago

C: Regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite could help us stay ahead of any potential threats.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernardo

11 months ago

B: I agree, it's important to be proactive in monitoring potential risks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eleni

12 months ago

A: I think monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) would be the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Diane

1 year ago

Implementing a competitive intelligence tool could provide valuable insights, but it doesn't directly address the need to respond to changes in the environment.

upvoted 0 times

Viki

1 year ago

C: Regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite

upvoted 0 times

...

Quinn

1 year ago

B: Monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs)

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernadine

1 year ago

A: Scheduling frequent threat analyses

upvoted 0 times

...

Lyla

1 year ago

I think regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite is crucial. It helps ensure the organization is prepared to handle the identified risks.

upvoted 0 times

Gearldine

11 months ago

D: Implementing a competitive intelligence tool could provide valuable insights into external factors that may affect the organization.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mollie

11 months ago

D: Implementing a competitive intelligence tool can provide valuable insights into the external environment to anticipate changes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nathan

11 months ago

C: Scheduling frequent threat analyses can help identify new risks that may impact critical business processes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lacresha

11 months ago

C: Scheduling frequent threat analyses can help identify new risks that may impact critical business processes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Whitney

11 months ago

B: Monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) is also important to stay ahead of potential threats.

upvoted 0 times

...

Princess

11 months ago

B: Monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) is also important to stay ahead of any potential threats.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denise

12 months ago

A: I agree, regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite is key to staying prepared.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

1 year ago

User 2

upvoted 0 times

...

Kendra

1 year ago

A: I agree, regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite is key to staying prepared for potential risks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marget

1 year ago

User 1

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherman

1 year ago

I believe C) Regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite could also be a good option to consider.

upvoted 0 times

...

Robt

1 year ago

I agree with Katina, monitoring key risk indicators would help in staying responsive to changes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerilyn

1 year ago

Monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) seems like the most comprehensive approach to staying on top of changes that could impact critical processes.

upvoted 0 times

Allene

12 months ago

D: Regularly reviewing the enterprise risk appetite is crucial for understanding the organization's tolerance for risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eura

12 months ago

C: Scheduling frequent threat analyses could also be helpful in identifying potential risks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlean

12 months ago

B: Agreed, it's important to keep a close eye on those indicators.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashaunda

1 year ago

A: I think monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katina

1 year ago

I think the answer is B) Monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs).

upvoted 0 times

...