New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca CGEIT Exam - Topic 9 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's CGEIT exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 9
[All CGEIT Questions]

An enterprise has identified a number of plausible risk scenarios that could result in economic loss associated with major IT investments. Which of the following is the BEST method to assess the risk?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Myong
4 months ago
Wait, can BIA really cover all the risk scenarios? Sounds a bit optimistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
4 months ago
Qualitative analysis? Not sure that captures the full picture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
4 months ago
Definitely leaning towards Quantitative analysis for precise metrics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
4 months ago
Cost-benefit analysis seems too simplistic for major IT investments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
5 months ago
I think Business Impact Analysis (BIA) is key for understanding risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
5 months ago
Cost-benefit analysis seems more focused on comparing options rather than assessing risk directly. I think it might not be the best method for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where quantitative analysis was highlighted as a strong method for assessing financial risks. I wonder if that applies here too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anissa
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think qualitative analysis could be useful for assessing risks in a more subjective way. It might not give a full picture though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rocco
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how a Business Impact Analysis (BIA) helps in understanding the potential impact of risks on business operations. That might be the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about the specifics here. I know Traps and Palo Alto Networks work together, but I can't quite remember the details of how the information flows between them. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I select the right answer choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. position: static; is the default, so that's not it. position: relative; positions an element relative to its normal position, and position: absolute; positions it relative to the nearest positioned ancestor. That leaves position: fixed; as the one that positions an element relative to the browser window. I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
5 months ago
This seems straightforward. I think the answer is C - setting the cartridge path so that app_newsite is before app_storefront.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with PolarDB, so I'll need to read through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel