Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca CGEIT Exam - Topic 7 Question 117 Discussion

Establishing a uniform definition for likelihood and impact through risk management standards PRIMARILY addresses which of the following concerns?
B) Conflicting interpretations of risk levels
A) Inconsistent categories of vulnerabilities
C) Inconsistent data classification
D) Lack of strategic IT alignment

Isaca CGEIT Exam - Topic 7 Question 117 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's CGEIT exam
Question #: 117
Topic #: 7
[All CGEIT Questions]

Establishing a uniform definition for likelihood and impact through risk management standards PRIMARILY addresses which of the following concerns?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Establishing a uniform definition for likelihood and impact through risk management standards primarily addresses the concern of conflicting interpretations of risk levels. This is because likelihood and impact are two key factors that determine the level of risk associated with a threat or event. Different stakeholders may have different perceptions and expectations of what constitutes a high, medium, or low likelihood or impact, which can lead to inconsistent or inaccurate risk assessment and management.By defining and applying a common set of criteria and scales for likelihood and impact, risk management standards can help to ensure a consistent and objective evaluation and communication of risk levels across the organization


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Carmen
1 day ago
Totally agree with B) - it's a big issue in risk management!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
6 days ago
Not sure if this really addresses D) Lack of strategic IT alignment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelica
11 days ago
Surprised this isn't more about C) Inconsistent data classification!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
17 days ago
I think it's more about A) Inconsistent categories of vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
22 days ago
Definitely B) Conflicting interpretations of risk levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
27 days ago
I’m a bit confused. I thought strategic IT alignment was important too, but I guess that’s more about overall strategy rather than definitions of risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
1 month ago
I feel like this could relate to C as well, since inconsistent data classification might affect how we assess risks. But B still seems more relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
1 month ago
I remember discussing how inconsistent categories of vulnerabilities could lead to confusion, but I’m not sure if that’s the main issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
1 month ago
I think this question is about how we interpret risk levels, so I’m leaning towards B. It seems like conflicting interpretations could really mess things up.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel