Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca CGEIT Exam - Topic 7 Question 117 Discussion

Posted by Hubert on Jul 17, 2026 at 02:22 PM

Establishing a uniform definition for likelihood and impact through risk management standards PRIMARILY addresses which of the following concerns?

Suggested Answer: B

Establishing a uniform definition for likelihood and impact through risk management standards primarily addresses the concern of conflicting interpretations of risk levels. This is because likelihood and impact are two key factors that determine the level of risk associated with a threat or event. Different stakeholders may have different perceptions and expectations of what constitutes a high, medium, or low likelihood or impact, which can lead to inconsistent or inaccurate risk assessment and management.By defining and applying a common set of criteria and scales for likelihood and impact, risk management standards can help to ensure a consistent and objective evaluation and communication of risk levels across the organization


Get Premium CGEIT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
KI
Kirk 1 month ago
I lean towards A. Inconsistent categories of vulnerabilities can confuse everyone.
FE
Felicitas 1 month ago
I agree, B makes sense. Different teams need to understand risks the same way.
GR
Gracia 1 month ago
I think it’s B. Conflicting interpretations of risk levels. It’s crucial for clarity.
CA
Carmen 2 months ago
Totally agree with B) - it's a big issue in risk management!
CA
Carla 2 months ago
Not sure if this really addresses D) Lack of strategic IT alignment.
AN
Angelica 2 months ago
Surprised this isn't more about C) Inconsistent data classification!
GE
Gerald 2 months ago
I think it's more about A) Inconsistent categories of vulnerabilities.
AM
Amber 2 months ago
Definitely B) Conflicting interpretations of risk levels.
FR
Franchesca 2 months ago
I’m a bit confused. I thought strategic IT alignment was important too, but I guess that’s more about overall strategy rather than definitions of risk.
JO
Josephine 3 months ago
I feel like this could relate to C as well, since inconsistent data classification might affect how we assess risks. But B still seems more relevant.
LA
Lawana 3 months ago
I remember discussing how inconsistent categories of vulnerabilities could lead to confusion, but I’m not sure if that’s the main issue here.
BR
Brittani 3 months ago
I think this question is about how we interpret risk levels, so I’m leaning towards B. It seems like conflicting interpretations could really mess things up.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel