Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IISFA Exam II0-001 Topic 4 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for IISFA's II0-001 exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 4
[All II0-001 Questions]

Port 25 forgery involves:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Ernest at Aug 10, 2023, 06:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium II0-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Eladia
1 months ago
Wait, we can use telnet to forge SMTP headers? Brb, going to try that on my boss's computer. What could go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
Eugene
13 days ago
C) A \'man in the middle\' attack that provides for forgery of layer 4 of the stack
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
15 days ago
B) Removed SMTP packet headers for modification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
19 days ago
A) Manual communications with an SMTP server via telnet utility to forge header information.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melda
1 months ago
Option D is a bit of a head-scratcher. Opening a server on port 25 that's not SMTP? Sounds like a recipe for disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
1 months ago
Option C is interesting, but a 'man in the middle' attack targeting layer 4 of the stack seems a bit overkill for just forging port 25 communications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) Removed SMTP packet headers for modification could also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
2 months ago
I'm not sure about option B. Removing SMTP packet headers for modification doesn't seem like a practical approach for port 25 forgery.
upvoted 0 times
Helga
20 days ago
D) Opening at server, other than SMTP, on port 25 in order to capture inbound communications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
20 days ago
User 2: Option B) Removed SMTP packet headers for modification does seem a bit far-fetched for port 25 forgery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
23 days ago
I agree, option B does seem less practical for port 25 forgery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
27 days ago
User 1: Option A) Manual communications with an SMTP server via telnet utility to forge header information seems more plausible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
1 months ago
C) A \'man in the middle\' attack that provides for forgery of layer 4 of the stack
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
1 months ago
A) Manual communications with an SMTP server via telnet utility to forge header information.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deonna
2 months ago
Option A sounds like the most plausible method for port 25 forgery. Manually communicating with an SMTP server via telnet to forge headers seems like a classic technique.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannon
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's C) A 'man in the middle' attack that provides for forgery of layer 4 of the stack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Manual communications with an SMTP server via telnet utility to forge header information.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel