Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IISFA II0-001 Exam - Topic 5 Question 115 Discussion

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978 was primarily dealing with:
B) Distinction between the rules of surveillance in dealing with domestic crime (covered under ECPA) and foreign power espionage.
A) The methods of gathering intelligence on foreign nations according to international rules of conduct.
C) There is no domestic OR international laws dealing specifically with foreign power espionage.
D) This law only dealt with the legality of collecting evidence on foreign soil for domestic investigation of foreign power espionage by federal agencies.

IISFA II0-001 Exam - Topic 5 Question 115 Discussion

Actual exam question for IISFA's II0-001 exam
Question #: 115
Topic #: 5
[All II0-001 Questions]

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978 was primarily dealing with:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Ceola at Jul 31, 2025, 09:40 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium II0-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Johnson
6 months ago
Totally agree with B! It’s crucial to differentiate those rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
6 months ago
Wait, are we sure there’s no law for foreign espionage? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
6 months ago
D seems a bit narrow, it’s more about oversight than just legality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
6 months ago
Definitely B, it’s all about the distinction in surveillance rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elroy
6 months ago
FISA was enacted in 1978 to regulate foreign intelligence surveillance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
7 months ago
I feel like option D is misleading. FISA isn't just about collecting evidence on foreign soil; it has broader implications for surveillance on foreign powers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
7 months ago
I’m a bit confused. I thought FISA was about gathering intelligence, but I can't recall if it specifically addressed domestic crime versus foreign espionage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
7 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think it had to do with distinguishing between domestic and foreign surveillance laws. Maybe option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cary
7 months ago
I think FISA was more about the rules for surveillance, especially regarding foreign powers, but I'm not entirely sure which option fits best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
7 months ago
Okay, I'm pretty confident that the answer is B. FISA was all about establishing the rules for surveillance of foreign powers, separate from domestic crime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the scope of FISA. Was it really just about the legality of collecting evidence abroad, or did it cover broader foreign intelligence gathering?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
8 months ago
The distinction between domestic and foreign surveillance rules is definitely important here. I think I can narrow it down to either A or B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
8 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key details about FISA before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
8 months ago
I agree with Julio, because FISA is about surveillance rules for foreign power espionage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
10 months ago
Ha! Option C reminds me of that spy movie where the agent says 'There are no rules!' Yeah, right. Good luck with that approach.
upvoted 0 times
Misty
8 months ago
Ha! Option C reminds me of that spy movie where the agent says 'There are no rules!' Yeah, right. Good luck with that approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
8 months ago
A) The methods of gathering intelligence on foreign nations according to international rules of conduct.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenda
10 months ago
D sounds like a trick answer. The FISA law wasn't just about collecting evidence overseas, it had a much broader scope than that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
10 months ago
C can't be right, there's no way there are no laws dealing with foreign espionage. That's just crazy talk.
upvoted 0 times
Isadora
8 months ago
A) The methods of gathering intelligence on foreign nations according to international rules of conduct.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rasheeda
10 months ago
I'm going with A. The FISA law was about establishing the rules and methods for how the government can legally spy on foreign nations. Gotta play by the rules, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Dudley
8 months ago
User 4: A sounds like the best option, we can't just spy on foreign nations without following international rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
8 months ago
User 3: Definitely, we need to make sure we are following the proper methods and guidelines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
9 months ago
User 2: Yeah, it's all about playing by the rules when it comes to gathering intelligence on foreign nations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
10 months ago
User 1: I agree, A seems like the right choice. Following international rules is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julio
10 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
10 months ago
Option B seems to be the most accurate. The FISA law was all about drawing a clear line between domestic surveillance and foreign intelligence gathering.
upvoted 0 times
Sharika
8 months ago
FISA was a significant step in ensuring that there were guidelines in place for gathering foreign intelligence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Han
8 months ago
It's important to have clear rules when it comes to surveillance, especially when dealing with foreign powers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
9 months ago
I agree, option B is definitely the most accurate. FISA was all about that distinction.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel