Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IISFA II0-001 Exam - Topic 1 Question 118 Discussion

Actual exam question for IISFA's II0-001 exam
Question #: 118
Topic #: 1
[All II0-001 Questions]

Auditing that discovers evidence of a crime can't be used as evidence because:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Edward at Nov 22, 2025, 06:10 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium II0-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Crista
23 hours ago
I think it's C. Search and seizure laws are crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
6 days ago
Miranda Act? I don't think that's it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
25 days ago
I thought it was about the 4th amendment, not the 9th.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
30 days ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
1 month ago
Totally agree, C is the right answer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
1 month ago
I thought the 9th Amendment was about rights not specifically mentioned in the Constitution, so I don't think that's it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
2 months ago
I feel like this question is tricky. I want to say it has to do with the 4th Amendment, which relates to search and seizure, but I'm not confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
2 months ago
Haha, the 9th amendment? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Clearly, it's C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
2 months ago
C) Definitely C. Gotta love those pesky search and seizure laws.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
2 months ago
D) The 9th amendment? Seriously? I think the auditor needs to brush up on their constitutional law.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
2 months ago
A) It can be used as evidence? Really? That's like saying a unicorn can be used as a paperweight.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
2 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at now. If the auditing process itself is considered an illegal search, then the evidence can't be used, even if it uncovers a crime. Tricky, but I think I've got it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
3 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. The key is understanding what makes evidence admissible in a criminal case. I think the right answer has to do with constitutional protections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
3 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know the Miranda Act is about rights during interrogation, but I'm not sure how that applies here. Gotta re-read the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
3 months ago
I remember a practice question about evidence and the Miranda Act, but I don't think that's the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
3 months ago
I think it might be related to search and seizure laws, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
4 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's C. Violating search and seizure laws is a big no-no in the auditing world.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
4 months ago
It violates search and seizure laws.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
4 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is C - it violates search and seizure laws. That's a key protection against unlawful evidence gathering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
4 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the legal principles around search and seizure and how they apply here.
upvoted 0 times
Sheridan
3 months ago
I think it might be about search and seizure laws.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel