IIBA-AAC Exam - Topic 2 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's IIBA-AAC exam

Question #: 55
Topic #: 2

A team has been delivering a steady stream of small value increments and has completed several solution components, with some still remaining. The solution owner examines the reactions to the delivered components from customers, and decides that the need has been met and the remaining potential components won't deliver enough additional value to justify doing them. The solution owner will:

ARequest Strategy Horizon input about what action to take

BAccept the work is complete and cancel remaining work

CFully document the working initiative

DAsk the team to come up with new, more valuable, solution components for the initiative

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

https://www.agilealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/AgileExtension_V2-Member-Copy.pdf (24)

by Yoko at Aug 04, 2023, 03:07 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium IIBA-AAC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Kassandra

4 months ago

C could be useful for future reference, but still prefer B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trina

4 months ago

A is a good option too, just to get more input.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antione

4 months ago

Wait, are they really sure the remaining components won't add value?

upvoted 0 times

...

Sylvie

5 months ago

Totally agree with B! No point in wasting resources.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorean

5 months ago

I think B makes the most sense here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tayna

5 months ago

I remember a similar scenario where we had to prioritize new components. Asking the team for new ideas sounds tempting, but it might not be the best choice if the current components are already meeting needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Claribel

5 months ago

I’m a bit confused about whether they should document the initiative fully or just cancel the remaining work. I guess it depends on how much value was actually delivered.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashton

5 months ago

This reminds me of a practice question where we had to decide on project completion based on customer feedback. I feel like option B makes the most sense here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cary

6 months ago

I think the solution owner would probably accept that the work is complete and cancel the remaining work, but I'm not entirely sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ressie

6 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the difference between risk mitigation and risk elimination. I'll need to review those concepts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reiko

6 months ago

I think this is a Denial-of-Service attack, but I'm not totally confident. The question doesn't explicitly use that term, so I want to make sure I'm not missing something. I'll re-read the options and try to eliminate the ones that don't fit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Estrella

6 months ago

Okay, let me see. The Deployment server and License master are both core Splunk components, so I don't think they require separate packages. But the Universal forwarder and Heavy forwarder are add-ons, so those must need their own installations. I'll go with C and D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladis

6 months ago

I'm not entirely sure about the purpose of the `Out` struct. Is it just a convenient way to print the `B` objects? I'll need to double-check how that's being used in the `for_each` loop.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamar

10 months ago

Option B is the way to go. Quit while you're ahead, I always say. Though I do hope the team gets a pizza party or something for all their hard work. They deserve a little celebration!

upvoted 0 times

Danica

9 months ago

User 3: I hope they do get a pizza party! They deserve some recognition for their hard work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tashia

9 months ago

User 2: I agree, it's important to recognize when the work is complete and move on to the next project.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gertude

10 months ago

User 1: Option B is definitely the best choice. No need to keep working on something that won't add much value.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noah

11 months ago

B all the way! Quit while you're ahead, I always say. No need to overwork the team on something that's not going to move the needle. Though I do hope they got some pizza or something for all their hard work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ozell

11 months ago

D sounds like a good idea. The team might be able to come up with some even more valuable solutions that the customer didn't even know they needed! Gotta keep that innovation flowing, right?

upvoted 0 times

Sanjuana

9 months ago

Theresia: Absolutely, can't wait to see what they come up with next. It's always exciting to see new solutions being developed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theresia

10 months ago

User 2: Definitely, innovation is key to staying ahead in the market. Let's see what new ideas the team can come up with!

upvoted 0 times

...

Emily

10 months ago

User 1: I agree, getting the team to come up with new solutions is a great way to keep things fresh and valuable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ria

11 months ago

I'd go with C. It's important to fully document the work that's been done, so future teams can learn from this experience. Plus, you never know when those remaining components might come in handy down the line.

upvoted 0 times

Willow

10 months ago

A: And who knows, those remaining components might be useful in the future.

upvoted 0 times

...

Robt

10 months ago

B: Yeah, I agree. It's always good to have a record of what we've accomplished.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

10 months ago

A: I think we should fully document the work we've done so far. It's important for future reference.

upvoted 0 times

...

Casey

11 months ago

Option B seems like the right call here. If the customer's needs have been met, why keep working on something that won't add much value? Time to move on to the next project!

upvoted 0 times