MENU
A team has been delivering a steady stream of small value increments and has completed several solution components, with some still remaining. The solution owner examines the reactions to the delivered components from customers, and decides that the need has been met and the remaining potential components won't deliver enough additional value to justify doing them. The solution owner will:
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium IIBA-AAC Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
KA
Kassandra
11 months ago
C could be useful for future reference, but still prefer B.
TR
Trina
12 months ago
A is a good option too, just to get more input.
AN
Antione
12 months ago
Wait, are they really sure the remaining components won't add value?
SY
Sylvie
1 year ago
Totally agree with B! No point in wasting resources.
LO
Lorean
1 year ago
I think B makes the most sense here.
TA
Tayna
1 year ago
I remember a similar scenario where we had to prioritize new components. Asking the team for new ideas sounds tempting, but it might not be the best choice if the current components are already meeting needs.
CL
Claribel
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about whether they should document the initiative fully or just cancel the remaining work. I guess it depends on how much value was actually delivered.
AS
Ashton
1 year ago
This reminds me of a practice question where we had to decide on project completion based on customer feedback. I feel like option B makes the most sense here.
CA
Cary
1 year ago
I think the solution owner would probably accept that the work is complete and cancel the remaining work, but I'm not entirely sure.
RE
Ressie
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the difference between risk mitigation and risk elimination. I'll need to review those concepts.
RE
Reiko
1 year ago
I think this is a Denial-of-Service attack, but I'm not totally confident. The question doesn't explicitly use that term, so I want to make sure I'm not missing something. I'll re-read the options and try to eliminate the ones that don't fit.
ES
Estrella
1 year ago
Okay, let me see. The Deployment server and License master are both core Splunk components, so I don't think they require separate packages. But the Universal forwarder and Heavy forwarder are add-ons, so those must need their own installations. I'll go with C and D.
GL
Gladis
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about the purpose of the `Out` struct. Is it just a convenient way to print the `B` objects? I'll need to double-check how that's being used in the `for_each` loop.
TA
Tamar
1 year ago
Option B is the way to go. Quit while you're ahead, I always say. Though I do hope the team gets a pizza party or something for all their hard work. They deserve a little celebration!
DA
Danica
1 year ago
User 3: I hope they do get a pizza party! They deserve some recognition for their hard work.
TA
Tashia
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, it's important to recognize when the work is complete and move on to the next project.
GE
Gertude
1 year ago
User 1: Option B is definitely the best choice. No need to keep working on something that won't add much value.
NO
Noah
2 years ago
B all the way! Quit while you're ahead, I always say. No need to overwork the team on something that's not going to move the needle. Though I do hope they got some pizza or something for all their hard work.
OZ
Ozell
2 years ago
D sounds like a good idea. The team might be able to come up with some even more valuable solutions that the customer didn't even know they needed! Gotta keep that innovation flowing, right?
SA
Sanjuana
1 year ago
Theresia: Absolutely, can't wait to see what they come up with next. It's always exciting to see new solutions being developed.
TH
Theresia
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely, innovation is key to staying ahead in the market. Let's see what new ideas the team can come up with!
EM
Emily
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, getting the team to come up with new solutions is a great way to keep things fresh and valuable.
RI
Ria
2 years ago
I'd go with C. It's important to fully document the work that's been done, so future teams can learn from this experience. Plus, you never know when those remaining components might come in handy down the line.
WI
Willow
1 year ago
A: And who knows, those remaining components might be useful in the future.
RO
Robt
1 year ago
B: Yeah, I agree. It's always good to have a record of what we've accomplished.
ER
Erick
1 year ago
A: I think we should fully document the work we've done so far. It's important for future reference.
CA
Casey
2 years ago
Option B seems like the right call here. If the customer's needs have been met, why keep working on something that won't add much value? Time to move on to the next project!
NA
Natalie
1 year ago
Beatriz: Definitely, time to move on to something more valuable.
NI
Niesha
1 year ago
User 3: It's important to focus on delivering value, so cancelling the remaining work makes sense.
BE
Beatriz
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, no point in continuing if the customer's needs are already met.
JA
Jacquline
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, option B is the way to go.
EL
Elli
1 year ago
Gail: That's a good point, Elli. It's always good to strive for continuous improvement and find ways to add more value.
XO
Xochitl
1 year ago
User 3: I think the team should definitely move on to new, more valuable components. Option D could lead to even better results.
GA
Gail
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, it's important to focus on delivering value. Cancelling the remaining work is the way to go.
RA
Rashida
2 years ago
User 1: I agree, option B makes sense. No need to continue if the customer's needs are already met.
AL
Alyssa
2 years ago
But shouldn't the team come up with new, more valuable components instead of just canceling the remaining work?
PO
Portia
2 years ago
I agree with Launa. It doesn't make sense to continue if the additional components won't add enough value.
LA
Launa
2 years ago
I think the solution owner should cancel the remaining work if the need has been met.