IIBA-AAC Exam - Topic 2 Question 101 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's IIBA-AAC exam

Question #: 101
Topic #: 2

[All IIBA-AAC Questions]

At the Initiative Horizon, the solution owner using iterative planning principles decides to plan for a period of:

A6-12 months because competitive analysis requires thorough analysis

B1-3 months because it can be determined if needs are being met

C3-6 months because stability is required for long term planning

D1-2 weeks because it aligns with the increments delivered by the team

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

https://www.agilealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/AgileExtension_V2-Member-Copy.pdf (46)

by Olga at Nov 20, 2025, 10:04 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium IIBA-AAC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Iraida

21 days ago

3-6 months balances stability and flexibility well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlesetta

26 days ago

I agree with 1-3 months. It keeps us agile and responsive.

upvoted 0 times

...

Phyliss

1 month ago

6-12 months feels too long. Market changes fast!

upvoted 0 times

...

Staci

1 month ago

1-2 weeks sounds too short. We need more time to assess.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latricia

1 month ago

I prefer 3-6 months. It gives time for adjustments.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynda

2 months ago

Totally agree, shorter cycles keep us agile!

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonora

2 months ago

Wait, 1-2 weeks? That seems too short for planning!

upvoted 0 times

...

My

2 months ago

3-6 months sounds reasonable for stability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vannessa

3 months ago

6-12 months is way too long for iterative planning.

upvoted 0 times

...

Detra

3 months ago

D) 1-2 weeks? What is this, a lemonade stand? Real businesses plan for the long haul!

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodolfo

3 months ago

C) 3-6 months because stability is required for long term planning. Slow and steady wins the race.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacquelyne

3 months ago

A) 6-12 months because competitive analysis requires thorough analysis. Gotta do it right, no shortcuts!

upvoted 0 times

...

Edison

3 months ago

D) 1-2 weeks because it aligns with the increments delivered by the team. This is the way!

upvoted 0 times

...

Gregoria

3 months ago

I have a vague memory of the importance of stability in planning, so C could be a contender, but I’m leaning towards B for its focus on immediate feedback.

upvoted 0 times

...

Earleen

4 months ago

I think we practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that 3-6 months might be too long for iterative planning. Maybe A is more about thoroughness than agility?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rima

4 months ago

I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like D could be a good option since it aligns with agile principles of delivering increments quickly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nidia

4 months ago

I remember discussing how shorter planning cycles can help adapt to changing needs, so I think B might be the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fallon

4 months ago

I'm leaning towards B - 1-3 months. The iterative planning approach suggests a focus on quickly adapting to meet needs, rather than a lengthy competitive analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mertie

4 months ago

D - 1-2 weeks seems too short. The question is about the Initiative Horizon, which implies a broader scope than just the increments delivered by the team.

upvoted 0 times

...

Penney

4 months ago

B) 1-3 months because it can be determined if needs are being met.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scarlet

5 months ago

I think 1-3 months is ideal. Quick feedback is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rex

5 months ago

Definitely C - 3-6 months. Stability is key for long-term planning, and the question specifically mentions this as a factor.

upvoted 0 times

...

Robt

5 months ago

I think 1-3 months is ideal for quick feedback!

upvoted 0 times

...

Vanda

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The question mentions "competitive analysis" which makes me think a longer planning period might be needed. I'm torn between A and C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Oren

6 months ago

I think the answer is B - 1-3 months. The question mentions iterative planning, so the focus should be on quickly determining if needs are being met rather than a longer planning horizon.

upvoted 0 times