The team members are discussing the level of effort that different backlog items are likely to require, and how much effort is available for the next sprint. This is an example of the principle:
This question is a total no-brainer. If the team members can't figure out what's 'doable', they might as well just throw darts at the backlog and hope for the best!
I'm pretty sure the correct answer is 'B) Understand what is doable'. After all, that's what they're doing - trying to figure out what the team can realistically accomplish in the next sprint.
I'm going with C) Respect for individuals. The team is collaborating to assess the workload, which shows mutual respect and consideration for each other's capabilities.
This is a classic case of 'Get real using examples' (D). The team is using their real-world understanding of the effort required to make informed decisions.
A) Analyze to determine what is valuable seems like a good option too. The team is evaluating the effort required for each backlog item, which is a form of analysis to determine their value.
I think the correct answer is B) Understand what is doable. The team is discussing the feasibility of the backlog items, which is all about understanding what is achievable within the next sprint.
Soledad
25 days agoRoyal
1 months agoAmber
10 hours agoAdolph
1 days agoMaia
20 days agoVeronica
1 months agoDenny
1 months agoFabiola
2 months agoCarman
2 months agoDallas
2 months agoKizzy
20 days agoOrville
24 days agoCarmen
2 months agoNieves
23 days agoLucy
1 months agoRaina
1 months agoJustine
1 months agoLawrence
2 months ago