Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA ECBA Exam - Topic 1 Question 90 Discussion

Posted by Marta on Jul 08, 2024 at 10:23 AM

What is a valid reason for prioritization?

Suggested Answer: B

Prioritization in business analysis is essential for focusing on the most valuable and feasible features that deliver the highest return on investment (ROI) and customer satisfaction. A valid reason for prioritization is the effort and resources needed to implement a requirement. This consideration ensures that the project's scope is managed effectively, aligning with the available resources and the project's overall goals.


Get Premium ECBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
CA
Cassie 11 months ago
Wait, are we seriously prioritizing based on a wish-list? That seems off.
DE
Devora 11 months ago
D is a bit too simplistic, we need to think bigger!
LA
Lai 12 months ago
C? Really? Just because the sponsor wants it doesn’t mean it’s important.
BI
Billye 12 months ago
A is valid too, personal interest can drive success.
CR
Cristen 1 year ago
B makes the most sense, gotta consider resources!
TH
Theola 1 year ago
I vaguely recall that prioritization should focus on value, so maybe option A or B could be valid, but I’m unsure.
AL
Alpha 1 year ago
I think we had a practice question about prioritizing based on stakeholder interests, but I'm not confident if that's the best reason.
LA
Laquanda 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option B makes sense since effort and resources are crucial for implementation.
ME
Merissa 1 year ago
I remember discussing prioritization in class, and I think it has to do with balancing stakeholder needs and project feasibility.
LO
Loren 1 year ago
I think I know the answer, but I want to double-check my understanding. Prioritizing based on the effort and resources required seems like the most logical and objective approach, so I'm going to go with option B.
PA
Paz 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to cover different aspects of prioritization, but I'm not sure which one is considered the most valid reason. I'll need to think this through carefully.
VI
Vivan 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about prioritization criteria. I'll need to carefully consider each option and think about which one best represents a valid reason for prioritization.
AF
Afton 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The valid reason for prioritization is B - the effort and resources needed to implement a requirement. That makes the most sense in terms of prioritizing based on practical considerations rather than personal interests or wishes.
MA
Maybelle 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is that the local AC tag ID on PE2 needs to match the local AC tag ID on PE1 for proper operation. The remote AC tag IDs don't need to match. I'll select option A.
KA
Karol 1 year ago
Key is to recall that underwater weighing estimates body fat percentage based on overall density, but doesn't literally divide body into parts. So A and C are probably wrong.
LE
Leslie 1 year ago
Isn't it about in-transit inventory? If everything is under one roof, there should be less stock in transit, right?
CI
Ciara 2 years ago
B is definitely the correct answer. We want to make the most of our resources, not waste them on personal interests or whims.
CA
Carman 2 years ago
Haha, D is like the 'easy mode' of project management. Nope, not gonna fall for that one.
MA
Matthew 2 years ago
↳ replying to Carman
B) Effort and resources needed to implement a requirement
TI
Titus 2 years ago
↳ replying to Carman
A) Requirements which are of significant personal interest to a stakeholder
LY
Lynelle 2 years ago
C? Really? Prioritizing a sponsor's wish-list over actual requirements? That's a recipe for disaster.
GL
Glory 2 years ago
↳ replying to Lynelle
C? Really? Prioritizing a sponsor's wish-list over actual requirements? That's a recipe for disaster.
RO
Royal 2 years ago
↳ replying to Lynelle
B) Effort and resources needed to implement a requirement
ST
Stefanie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Lynelle
A) Requirements which are of significant personal interest to a stakeholder
GW
Gwen 2 years ago
I see your point, My. Prioritizing based on stakeholder interest can also lead to better buy-in and support for the project.
MY
My 2 years ago
I believe A) Requirements which are of significant personal interest to a stakeholder can also be a valid reason for prioritization, as it can drive stakeholder engagement and satisfaction.
MI
Mireya 2 years ago
I agree with Ivette. Prioritizing based on the effort and resources needed makes sense to ensure efficient use of resources.
IV
Ivette 2 years ago
I think B) Effort and resources needed to implement a requirement is a valid reason for prioritization.
VE
Vernell 2 years ago
I agree, B is the way to go. Gotta be realistic about what the team can handle, right?
NU
Nu 2 years ago
↳ replying to Vernell
I agree, B is the way to go. Gotta be realistic about what the team can handle, right?
JU
Jutta 2 years ago
↳ replying to Vernell
B) Effort and resources needed to implement a requirement
ER
Ernest 2 years ago
↳ replying to Vernell
A) Requirements which are of significant personal interest to a stakeholder
RI
Ricarda 2 years ago
Option B seems like the most logical choice. Prioritizing based on effort and resources is crucial for project success.
SH
Shenika 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ricarda
Prioritizing based on stakeholder interest can also be important.
CA
Carolann 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ricarda
Definitely, we need to focus on what is feasible and realistic.
FR
Freeman 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ricarda
It ensures that we are using our resources efficiently.
CR
Cristy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ricarda
I agree, prioritizing based on effort and resources is key.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel