Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA CCBA Exam - Topic 5 Question 105 Discussion

Posted by Zachary on Jan 11, 2025 at 09:04 PM

A business analyst must consider the business value a solution brings in relation to the cost of implementing the desired solution. Suppliers will often be limited in the amount of requirements they can implement based on the allocated resources. If there are not enough resources to implement all of the solutions, what can the business analyst create to justify the additional funds for the implementation?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium CCBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
AL
Alpha 11 months ago
Totally agree with the business case option! It’s essential for funding.
BU
Bulah 11 months ago
Really? I’m not sure a business case alone will convince anyone.
LE
Leonida 12 months ago
Benefits-cost ratio is key for showing value vs. cost!
SA
Sabra 12 months ago
I think a cost analysis is more practical for this situation.
IL
Ilda 1 year ago
Definitely a business case! It lays out the justification clearly.
AL
Aliza 1 year ago
I keep getting mixed up between risk assessments and business cases. I think a business case is more focused on justifying funds, though.
EM
Emeline 1 year ago
I feel like we did a practice question on this, and I think the benefits-cost ratio was mentioned as a way to justify expenses.
MY
Myrtie 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think a cost analysis might help too. It could show the financial impact of not implementing the solution.
EL
Elenora 1 year ago
I remember studying the importance of a business case in justifying additional funds. It seems like the right choice here.
EV
Evelynn 1 year ago
I think the business case is the way to go. It allows you to clearly articulate the business value and justify the investment. The other options seem more focused on the financial analysis, which is important, but the business case is the overarching document that ties it all together.
DA
Darnell 1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. Does the "positive risk analysis" in option C mean we should focus on the potential upside of the project? I'm not sure how that would work in this context.
JU
Julian 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this! The key is to create a comprehensive business case that outlines the costs, risks, and potential benefits of the solution. That will give the decision-makers the information they need to approve the additional funding.
LO
Lorean 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm trying to decide between the business case and the benefits-cost ratio. I'll need to think through the pros and cons of each approach.
LO
Long 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about justifying additional funds for a project. I think a business case would be the best approach to demonstrate the value and benefits of the solution.
RY
Ryann 2 years ago
Definitely D) Benefits-cost ratio. Gotta crunch those numbers and show the boss why it's worth the investment. Although, I'm more of a risk assessment kind of guy. You know, the 'what could go wrong' approach.
GI
Gilberto 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ryann
Definitely D) Benefits-cost ratio. Gotta crunch those numbers and show the boss why it's worth the investment.
ST
Steffanie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ryann
D) Benefits-cost ratio
VI
Vinnie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ryann
C) Risk assessment with positive risk analysis
CH
Chandra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ryann
B) Cost analysis
SH
Shasta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ryann
A) Business case
LE
Leonor 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ryann
Definitely D) Benefits-cost ratio. Gotta crunch those numbers and show the boss why it's worth the investment.
MA
Mari 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ryann
D) Benefits-cost ratio
ER
Eric 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ryann
C) Risk assessment with positive risk analysis
OL
Oliva 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ryann
B) Cost analysis
KI
Kimbery 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ryann
A) Business case
EN
Ena 2 years ago
D) Benefits-cost ratio is the way to go. Who doesn't love a good cost-benefit analysis? It's like spreadsheets and financial jargon, but with a purpose!
HO
Hollis 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ena
D) Benefits-cost ratio
GL
Gladys 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ena
C) Risk assessment with positive risk analysis
MA
Marti 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ena
B) Cost analysis
KA
Kanisha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ena
A) Business case
DA
Daniela 2 years ago
I was thinking B) Cost analysis, but D) Benefits-cost ratio makes more sense. It provides a clear comparison to prioritize the business value.
DE
Detra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Daniela
D) Benefits-cost ratio
EZ
Ezekiel 2 years ago
↳ replying to Daniela
A) Business case
KI
Kimberely 2 years ago
I think the correct answer is D) Benefits-cost ratio. This will help justify the additional funds by showing the potential benefits outweigh the costs of implementation.
MA
Martina 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) Benefits-cost ratio could also be a good option to consider.
HE
Herminia 2 years ago
I agree with Howard. A business case would help justify the additional funds for implementation.
HO
Howard 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Business case.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel