Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IIBA CCBA Exam - Topic 4 Question 97 Discussion

Two stakeholders are arguing over which model to use for describing requirements. One insists that using an activity diagram is superior while the other prefers a state diagram. How should the business analyst (BA) resolve the conflict?
A) Explain that the models are complementation to each other
B) Allow both stakeholders to work on the models independently
C) Introduce a third model type so that neither stakeholder prevails
D) Suggest a fusion model that integrates activity and state diagrams

IIBA CCBA Exam - Topic 4 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CCBA exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 4
[All CCBA Questions]

Two stakeholders are arguing over which model to use for describing requirements. One insists that using an activity diagram is superior while the other prefers a state diagram. How should the business analyst (BA) resolve the conflict?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Flo at Sep 18, 2024, 09:20 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Mitsue
10 months ago
Introducing a third model could just confuse everyone more!
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
10 months ago
A fusion model? Sounds complicated, not sure it’ll work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
10 months ago
Why not just use both? They complement each other!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bong
10 months ago
I think state diagrams are more intuitive for tracking changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iesha
11 months ago
Activity diagrams show processes clearly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
11 months ago
Suggesting a fusion model sounds interesting! I think option D could help both stakeholders see the bigger picture together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
11 months ago
I feel like introducing a third model might just complicate things further. Option C seems risky, but I guess it could work if done right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
11 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. I think allowing them to work independently, like in option B, could lead to more creative solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
11 months ago
I remember we discussed how activity and state diagrams can complement each other in class. Maybe option A is the best choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
11 months ago
Option D sounds interesting - a fusion model that integrates the two. I'll make sure to research that idea and be prepared to discuss it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the differences between activity and state diagrams. I'll need to review those concepts before the exam to be able to provide a strong recommendation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
11 months ago
The key is to find a solution that satisfies both stakeholders. I'm leaning towards option A - explaining how the models are complementary and can be used together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilburn
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky situation. I'll need to carefully consider the pros and cons of each model to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shoshana
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to be getting at the integration of testing with other processes, but I'm not totally clear on the right answer. I'll need to review my notes and think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
2 years ago
Option B is clearly the way to go - let them duke it out in a good ol' fashioned model-off. Loser has to buy the BA a coffee. Or, you know, a stronger drink.
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
2 years ago
Option C is a bold move, but I'm not sure introducing a third model is the way to go. Seems like it might just create more confusion. Keep it simple, folks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
2 years ago
I'm with the stakeholder who prefers the state diagram. It's just more fun to draw, you know? But option A makes the most sense for resolving this conflict.
upvoted 0 times
Alton
2 years ago
Stakeholder 1: That sounds like a good compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamela
2 years ago
BA: We can use both models, they complement each other.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
2 years ago
Stakeholder 2: I prefer the activity diagram, it provides a clearer view.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
2 years ago
Stakeholder 1: I think we should use the state diagram for requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catalina
2 years ago
Option D sounds like the best solution. A fusion model that integrates the two would be a wise compromise. Gotta keep those stakeholders happy, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
2 years ago
I think option A is the way to go. The models are complementary, not mutually exclusive. The BA should explain how they can work together to get a more complete picture.
upvoted 0 times
Tawna
2 years ago
Yes, the BA should emphasize that the models complement each other. This way, both stakeholders can see the value in using a combination of activity and state diagrams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
2 years ago
I agree, using both models can help capture different aspects of the system. It's important for the BA to communicate this to the stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
2 years ago
Option A is definitely the best choice. The activity diagram and state diagram can work together to provide a comprehensive view of the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tijuana
2 years ago
I believe the BA should suggest a fusion model that combines both diagrams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
2 years ago
I prefer using a state diagram, it's more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
2 years ago
I think we should use an activity diagram for requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel