Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA CCBA Exam - Topic 4 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CCBA exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 4
[All CCBA Questions]

A project to replace a financial system uses a waterfall methodology. Initially, meetings with the project subject

matter experts (SMEs) were positive. As the project progressed through the requirements and design phases, the SMEs attended fewer meetings, resulting in a delay to the project build phase. What should the business analyst (BA) have done to prevent the delay?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Burma
4 months ago
Not sure if new SMEs would solve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
5 months ago
Definitely should've modified the governance structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
5 months ago
Surprised they didn't keep the SMEs involved more!
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
5 months ago
I think selecting a different methodology could've helped.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
5 months ago
Engaging in consistent collaboration is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
5 months ago
Engaging in consistent collaboration sounds like the best choice. I recall a case study where lack of communication led to project delays, so this seems crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
5 months ago
I think modifying the governance structure might have been a viable option, but I'm not entirely clear on how that would directly impact SME participation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
5 months ago
I'm not sure if changing the methodology would have been the right move. We practiced a similar question where sticking to the plan was emphasized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
6 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of continuous engagement with SMEs in our practice sessions. It seems like consistent collaboration could have helped here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. The options all seem to have some merit, but I'm not sure which one is the "always" advantage. I'll have to review my notes and try to reason through this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
6 months ago
This looks straightforward enough. I'll just need to do the math based on the frequency information and the code to determine the number of observations written to the output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leila
6 months ago
Ah, I remember learning about ABC in my cost accounting class. It's a technique for allocating overhead costs to products or services based on the activities that drive those costs. I'm pretty confident D is the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
6 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. There are a lot of moving parts with the acquisition and integrating the new satellite monitoring systems. I'll need to think through the architecture domains and sequencing carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
6 months ago
Okay, let me see here. The image UDO is probably used in One View Reports or CafeOne Layout. I'm leaning towards One View Reports, but I'll double-check my notes just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel