Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA CCBA Exam - Topic 3 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CCBA exam
Question #: 98
Topic #: 3
[All CCBA Questions]

After a number of requirements elicitation workshops, the business analyst (BA) notices that two business stakeholders did not speak up during any of the discussions. What should the BA do in the next workshop?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Cyndy
4 months ago
Option D seems harsh. They might just need a little encouragement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
4 months ago
I doubt just letting them be will work. They might never speak up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Percy
4 months ago
Surprised that they didn't speak up at all! What if they have valuable insights?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rocco
4 months ago
Totally agree with C! Can't leave anyone out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
5 months ago
I think option C is the best choice. Everyone should have a chance to speak.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
5 months ago
I feel like just proceeding as normal might not be the right choice. If they didn't speak up before, what makes us think they will now?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
5 months ago
I think I saw a similar question in our practice exam, and the answer was about ensuring everyone has a chance to contribute. That makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
5 months ago
I'm not sure if allowing just the two stakeholders to speak is a good idea. It might make them feel singled out and uncomfortable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
5 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of engaging all stakeholders in workshops, so I think asking for input from everyone could be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
5 months ago
Option A seems a bit risky to me - singling out those two stakeholders could make the others feel left out. I'd lean more towards C or even B, unless there's a clear reason why those two haven't been participating.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit torn on this one. Part of me wants to go with option B and just let things play out, but I also see the value in being more proactive like in option C. Guess I'll have to weigh the pros and cons carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
5 months ago
I think option C is the way to go here. Giving each stakeholder a chance to provide input is important, even if some are more vocal than others. Actively soliciting feedback from everyone will help ensure we get a full picture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
6 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'd want to make sure I understand the context - why did those two stakeholders not speak up before? Might be good to have a private chat with them first to see if there are any barriers or concerns we can address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
6 months ago
I remember something about countersignatures, but I'm unsure if it's about trustworthiness or just the appointment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
1 year ago
Avoiding the quiet stakeholders is a big no-no. Option C is the clear winner here. Can't have a successful project without everyone's input.
upvoted 0 times
Sonia
1 year ago
It's important to hear from all stakeholders for a successful project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
1 year ago
Let's make sure to ask for input from everyone in the next workshop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
1 year ago
Let's give them the opportunity to share their thoughts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
1 year ago
Agreed, we can't leave anyone out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
1 year ago
Agreed, we can't leave anyone out of the discussion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
1 year ago
We need to make sure everyone has a chance to speak.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
1 year ago
We need to make sure everyone has a chance to speak up.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Irving
1 year ago
I disagree, we should allow only the two stakeholders to speak, so that others can hear their input.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asuncion
1 year ago
I like the humor in Option A, but in reality, that's not the best approach. Option C is the most inclusive and professional solution.
upvoted 0 times
Paul
1 year ago
Excluding the two stakeholders might not be the best approach, they could have valuable insights to share.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
1 year ago
It's important to make sure all stakeholders have a chance to speak and provide their input.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
1 year ago
I agree, Option C is the most inclusive and professional solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willard
1 year ago
I agree, it's important to make sure all stakeholders are given time to provide their opinions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
1 year ago
I agree, Option C is the best choice. Forcing the quiet stakeholders to speak might backfire and make them even more reluctant to engage.
upvoted 0 times
Maile
1 year ago
Yes, it's about creating a safe and inclusive environment for all stakeholders to participate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
1 year ago
It's important to make sure everyone has a chance to share their thoughts and perspectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
1 year ago
Agreed, forcing the quiet stakeholders to speak might backfire and make them even more reluctant to engage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
1 year ago
I think we should ask all attendees for their input, ensuring that each stakeholder is given time to speak and provide their opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nydia
2 years ago
I think we should ask all attendees for their input, so that everyone has a chance to speak.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
2 years ago
Option C is the way to go. Giving everyone a chance to speak ensures we get a comprehensive view of the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Mabelle
1 year ago
Yes, everyone's input is valuable in understanding the requirements fully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
2 years ago
I agree, it's important to hear from all stakeholders to get a complete picture.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel