Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA CCBA Exam - Topic 1 Question 120 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CCBA exam
Question #: 120
Topic #: 1
[All CCBA Questions]

Which basis for prioritization allows the project team to work initially with lower-risk requirements first?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Positive risk ranking is a basis for prioritization that allows the project team to work initially with lower-risk requirements first. Positive risk ranking is a technique that assigns a score to each requirement based on the level of risk associated with it, where a higher score indicates a lower risk and a lower score indicates a higher risk. The requirements are then prioritized in descending order of their scores, so that the project team can focus on the requirements that have the least uncertainty, complexity, or volatility first, and defer the requirements that have the most uncertainty, complexity, or volatility later.Positive risk ranking helps to reduce the likelihood and impact of potential problems, issues, or changes that may affect the requirements or the solution12

Option A is incorrect because quantitative ranking is not a basis for prioritization that allows the project team to work initially with lower-risk requirements first, but a technique that uses numerical values to compare and rank the requirements based on multiple criteria, such as value, cost, risk, urgency, dependency, etc.Quantitative ranking does not necessarily prioritize the lower-risk requirements first, but the requirements that have the highest overall score based on the weighted criteria34

Option C is incorrect because relationship to other requirements is not a basis for prioritization that allows the project team to work initially with lower-risk requirements first, but a factor that considers the dependencies and interdependencies among the requirements, such as prerequisite, co-requisite, or conflicting requirements. Relationship to other requirements does not necessarily prioritize the lower-risk requirements first, but the requirements that have the most influence or impact on the other requirements.

Option D is incorrect because implementation difficulty is not a basis for prioritization that allows the project team to work initially with lower-risk requirements first, but a factor that considers the effort, time, resources, and skills required to implement the requirements. Implementation difficulty does not necessarily prioritize the lower-risk requirements first, but the requirements that have the least difficulty or complexity to implement.


Business Analysis Techniques - ECBA, CCBA, CBAP Endorsed, Section 8.5: Prioritization, p. 101-102.

Certification of Capability in Business Analysis (CCBA) - Simplilearn, Module 7: Requirements Analysis and Design Definition, Lesson 7.5: Define Transition Requirements, p. 6-7.

Business Analysis Techniques - ECBA, CCBA, CBAP Endorsed, Section 8.5: Prioritization, p. 102-103.

Certification of Capability in Business Analysis (CCBA) - Simplilearn, Module 7: Requirements Analysis and Design Definition, Lesson 7.5: Define Transition Requirements, p. 8-9.

[Business Analysis Techniques - ECBA, CCBA, CBAP Endorsed], Section 8.5: Prioritization, p. 100-101.

[Certification of Capability in Business Analysis (CCBA) - Simplilearn], Module 7: Requirements Analysis and Design Definition, Lesson 7.5: Define Transition Requirements, p. 10-11.

[Business Analysis Techniques - ECBA, CCBA, CBAP Endorsed], Section 8.5: Prioritization, p. 100.

[Certification of Capability in Business Analysis (CCBA) - Simplilearn], Module 7: Requirements Analysis and Design Definition, Lesson 7.5: Define Transition Requirements, p. 12-13.

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Adolph
1 day ago
Haha, I'm just here for the free snacks. What was the question again?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
7 days ago
A seems like the safe bet. Gotta play it smart, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yong
28 days ago
B sounds like a bold move, but I'm feeling lucky today.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
1 month ago
Definitely C. Gotta keep those dependencies in check, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
1 month ago
I think option D is the way to go. Who doesn't love a good challenge?
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
1 month ago
I’m leaning towards C) Relationship to other requirements, but I’m not confident that it specifically addresses lower-risk requirements first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
2 months ago
I feel like A) Quantitative ranking could also apply here, but it seems more about measuring than prioritizing by risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
2 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think it was about prioritizing based on implementation difficulty. So maybe D) Implementation difficulty could be relevant too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
2 months ago
I think the answer might be B) Positive risk ranking, since it focuses on lower-risk items first, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
2 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. Positive risk ranking is the method that allows the team to start with the lower-risk requirements, which is key for managing project risk. I'm going with B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
2 months ago
Relationship to other requirements doesn't seem directly related to risk, so I'm going to rule that one out. I'm leaning towards positive risk ranking, but I'll double-check the definitions to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
2 months ago
Okay, this seems like it's testing our understanding of different prioritization techniques. I'm going to think through each option carefully and try to determine which one focuses on lower-risk requirements first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if I fully understand the differences between the options. I might need to review my notes on prioritization methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
3 months ago
I think I'd start by considering the risk factor - that seems like the key here. Positive risk ranking sounds like it could be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel