Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IIBA CBAP Exam - Topic 4 Question 83 Discussion

The business sponsor of a project to automate a high risk, high profile process has expressed concerns that some activities people perform will be missed. The business analyst (BA) has already created a process flow with associated user stories.Which of the following actions will address the sponsor's concerns?
C) Demonstrate traceability to the business case
A) Record the concerns in the risk register
B) Schedule a formal review with the stakeholders
D) Review the final approved elicitation results

IIBA CBAP Exam - Topic 4 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CBAP exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 4
[All CBAP Questions]

The business sponsor of a project to automate a high risk, high profile process has expressed concerns that some activities people perform will be missed. The business analyst (BA) has already created a process flow with associated user stories.

Which of the following actions will address the sponsor's concerns?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Cyril at Mar 21, 2024, 11:40 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBAP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shay
10 months ago
Reviewing elicitation results is important, but not enough alone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
10 months ago
Surprised that traceability isn't the first choice here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
10 months ago
Recording concerns in the risk register seems too passive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alayna
10 months ago
Totally agree, stakeholder input is crucial!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
11 months ago
I think scheduling a formal review is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
11 months ago
Reviewing the final approved elicitation results seems relevant, but I wonder if that would really reassure the sponsor about the process being complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rocco
11 months ago
I feel like demonstrating traceability to the business case could help, but it might not directly address the sponsor's worries about missing activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think recording concerns in the risk register is more about documenting issues rather than addressing them directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
11 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of stakeholder engagement, so scheduling a formal review might be the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
11 months ago
Okay, let's see here. Recording the concerns in the risk register seems like a good first step to document the issue. But I wonder if a formal review with stakeholders might be even more effective to really address the sponsor's worries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Millie
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few options that seem reasonable, but I'm not totally confident in which one is the best approach. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about addressing a sponsor's concerns. I think the key is to focus on actions that demonstrate transparency and collaboration with stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
12 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards the option to demonstrate traceability to the business case, as that would help show how the process aligns with the original goals. But I could also see value in reviewing the final elicitation results to validate nothing was missed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
12 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a plan. I'll use a static analysis tool to quickly scan the code and identify any obvious problems. Then I'll run some targeted test cases with a dynamic analysis tool to see if I can reproduce and diagnose the crashing issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
12 months ago
I'm a little confused on this one. I know validity is important, but I'm not sure which of these options best captures the full definition. Maybe I should review my notes before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanjuana
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. Do I need to use a DoubleStream or an IntStream? I'll have to review the stream API to make sure I choose the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
1 year ago
I can't believe they're still using a 'process flow' in this day and age. Shouldn't they be using some kind of AI-powered, blockchain-enabled, cloud-based workflow management system? The future is now!
upvoted 0 times
Lino
1 year ago
User 3: C) Demonstrate traceability to the business case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
1 year ago
User 2: A) Record the concerns in the risk register.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
1 year ago
User 1: Maybe they should consider updating their tools.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cecilia
1 year ago
Option D is a bit too late in the game. By the time you review the final results, it'll be too late to address any concerns. Better to do that earlier in the process, like with Option B.
upvoted 0 times
Leota
1 year ago
C) Demonstrate traceability to the business case
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
1 year ago
B) Schedule a formal review with the stakeholders
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
1 year ago
A) Record the concerns in the risk register
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elfrieda
1 year ago
Hmm, I wonder if the sponsor is just trying to micromanage the project. Recording the concerns in the risk register seems like a waste of time. Let's just get this done and move on!
upvoted 0 times
Dan
1 year ago
D) Review the final approved elicitation results
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
1 year ago
C) Demonstrate traceability to the business case
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
1 year ago
C) Demonstrate traceability to the business case
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
1 year ago
B) Schedule a formal review with the stakeholders
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
1 year ago
B) Schedule a formal review with the stakeholders
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
1 year ago
A) Record the concerns in the risk register
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
1 year ago
A) Record the concerns in the risk register
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Verdell
1 year ago
I'm not sure why the sponsor is worried. As long as the BA has done a thorough job, the process flow and user stories should cover everything. But I guess it doesn't hurt to schedule a formal review just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
An
1 year ago
B) Schedule a formal review with the stakeholders
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
1 year ago
I'm not sure why the sponsor is worried. As long as the BA has done a thorough job, the process flow and user stories should cover everything. But I guess it doesn't hurt to schedule a formal review just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
1 year ago
C) Demonstrate traceability to the business case
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
1 year ago
A) Record the concerns in the risk register
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
1 year ago
B) Schedule a formal review with the stakeholders
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
1 year ago
A) Record the concerns in the risk register
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rene
1 year ago
Option C looks like the best way to address the sponsor's concerns. Traceability to the business case will show how the requirements and user stories align with the project's objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
1 year ago
I believe demonstrating traceability to the business case will also help address the sponsor's concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
1 year ago
I agree with Elliot. It's important to involve stakeholders to address concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
1 year ago
I think scheduling a formal review with stakeholders is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel