MENU
The business sponsor of a project to automate a high risk, high profile process has expressed concerns that some activities people perform will be missed. The business analyst (BA) has already created a process flow with associated user stories.
Which of the following actions will address the sponsor's concerns?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CBAP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
43 comments · newest first
SH
Shay
11 months ago
Reviewing elicitation results is important, but not enough alone.
PH
Phillip
11 months ago
Surprised that traceability isn't the first choice here!
JA
Jade
12 months ago
Recording concerns in the risk register seems too passive.
AL
Alayna
12 months ago
Totally agree, stakeholder input is crucial!
LA
Lashawnda
1 year ago
I think scheduling a formal review is key.
RO
Rory
1 year ago
Reviewing the final approved elicitation results seems relevant, but I wonder if that would really reassure the sponsor about the process being complete.
RO
Rocco
1 year ago
I feel like demonstrating traceability to the business case could help, but it might not directly address the sponsor's worries about missing activities.
MI
Ming
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think recording concerns in the risk register is more about documenting issues rather than addressing them directly.
DE
Detra
1 year ago
I remember we discussed the importance of stakeholder engagement, so scheduling a formal review might be the best option here.
NO
Noel
1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. Recording the concerns in the risk register seems like a good first step to document the issue. But I wonder if a formal review with stakeholders might be even more effective to really address the sponsor's worries.
MI
Millie
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few options that seem reasonable, but I'm not totally confident in which one is the best approach. I'll need to think it through carefully.
VI
Virgina
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about addressing a sponsor's concerns. I think the key is to focus on actions that demonstrate transparency and collaboration with stakeholders.
BI
Billye
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards the option to demonstrate traceability to the business case, as that would help show how the process aligns with the original goals. But I could also see value in reviewing the final elicitation results to validate nothing was missed.
TH
Theron
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got a plan. I'll use a static analysis tool to quickly scan the code and identify any obvious problems. Then I'll run some targeted test cases with a dynamic analysis tool to see if I can reproduce and diagnose the crashing issue.
DO
Donte
1 year ago
I'm a little confused on this one. I know validity is important, but I'm not sure which of these options best captures the full definition. Maybe I should review my notes before answering.
SA
Sanjuana
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused here. Do I need to use a DoubleStream or an IntStream? I'll have to review the stream API to make sure I choose the right one.
KR
Krystal
1 year ago
I can't believe they're still using a 'process flow' in this day and age. Shouldn't they be using some kind of AI-powered, blockchain-enabled, cloud-based workflow management system? The future is now!
LI
Lino
1 year ago
User 3: C) Demonstrate traceability to the business case.
CO
Cora
1 year ago
User 2: A) Record the concerns in the risk register.
LO
Lovetta
1 year ago
User 1: Maybe they should consider updating their tools.
CE
Cecilia
2 years ago
Option D is a bit too late in the game. By the time you review the final results, it'll be too late to address any concerns. Better to do that earlier in the process, like with Option B.
LE
Leota
1 year ago
C) Demonstrate traceability to the business case
CH
Cherelle
1 year ago
B) Schedule a formal review with the stakeholders
LO
Lottie
1 year ago
A) Record the concerns in the risk register
EL
Elfrieda
2 years ago
Hmm, I wonder if the sponsor is just trying to micromanage the project. Recording the concerns in the risk register seems like a waste of time. Let's just get this done and move on!
DA
Dan
1 year ago
D) Review the final approved elicitation results
MA
Marylou
1 year ago
C) Demonstrate traceability to the business case
KR
Krissy
1 year ago
C) Demonstrate traceability to the business case
RE
Ressie
1 year ago
B) Schedule a formal review with the stakeholders
NA
Nan
1 year ago
B) Schedule a formal review with the stakeholders
RE
Remona
1 year ago
A) Record the concerns in the risk register
NA
Nana
1 year ago
A) Record the concerns in the risk register
VE
Verdell
2 years ago
I'm not sure why the sponsor is worried. As long as the BA has done a thorough job, the process flow and user stories should cover everything. But I guess it doesn't hurt to schedule a formal review just to be safe.
AN
An
1 year ago
B) Schedule a formal review with the stakeholders
MA
Marjory
1 year ago
I'm not sure why the sponsor is worried. As long as the BA has done a thorough job, the process flow and user stories should cover everything. But I guess it doesn't hurt to schedule a formal review just to be safe.
UL
Ulysses
2 years ago
C) Demonstrate traceability to the business case
AN
Andrew
2 years ago
A) Record the concerns in the risk register
AL
Albina
2 years ago
B) Schedule a formal review with the stakeholders
GI
Gianna
2 years ago
A) Record the concerns in the risk register
RE
Rene
2 years ago
Option C looks like the best way to address the sponsor's concerns. Traceability to the business case will show how the requirements and user stories align with the project's objectives.
AL
Alishia
2 years ago
I believe demonstrating traceability to the business case will also help address the sponsor's concerns.
CO
Colby
2 years ago
I agree with Elliot. It's important to involve stakeholders to address concerns.
EL
Elliot
2 years ago
I think scheduling a formal review with stakeholders is the best option.