Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA CBAP Exam - Topic 4 Question 110 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CBAP exam
Question #: 110
Topic #: 4
[All CBAP Questions]

A very large insurer of General Liability and Property Damage insurance has an upward trend of increased claims over the past 5 years.

The Risk Control Area for that company has just completed a 12 month Pilot of a new improved Risk Control Site.

The purpose of the site is to help their customers manage their exposures and ideally prevent them from having claims There were 100 customers that were part of the Pilot that represented 25 different industries. The business goals were to increase use of the site and provide tools to help customer awareness of their exposures, so that they may reduce existing exposures and ultimately reduce claims.

The sites Features were as follows:

* Improvements to the search engine to all customers to search for articles, tools and services on the site

* A checklist function that allow customer to create their own unique Checklists or utilize a sample provided by ABC company to use daily, weekly etc for an area of their facility.

* A promotion feature - where Risk preventing Articles, and tools on the site are marketed toward a customer.

* A profile section allowing for Customer Name, Address and contact Phone number.

Alter the 12 month pilot the business sponsor received an assessment of what was working and what was not. The Assessment of the pilot revealed overall site activity had significantly increased, however only 5% of the time the promotions were viewed. And the most shocking was that total claims increased by nearly 20% for these 100 customers during the pilot period. The business sponsor was perplexed as he had an expectation of reduced claims and at least for 30% viewing of promotions since the project team had spent a lot of careful time and effort on this feature. A BA was assigned to do further analysis regarding the low use of the promotions and why claims were not being reduced.

Regarding the use of promotions the BA looked into other similar companies to see what they did differently to get their customer to look at their promotions. The BA found that similar companies had promotions that targeted the industry the customer was in so it was more relevant to them and they were more interested to view the promotion. In addition the BA sent out a survey to all 100 pilot customers asking probing questions about what they thought of the site and if they felt it had decreased their exposure to risk sufficiently. The Survey responses came back with raving positive comments and providing examples of how the site had been helping in the reduction of claims from the customer's perspective. In addition the survey also revealed insight that the customers found the promotion often irrelevant to their industry.

The BA asked for a dump of all documentation of the 1000 claims that were filed over the 12 month pilot period. The BA found the nearly 90% of the claim filed were all in one region of the country and were all for property damage related to several severe winter storms in the region and the claims were nearly all unavoidable by the customers. The BA brought all this analysis back to the business sponsor and made the recommendation to the business sponsor to require the customer to select 1 of 25 industries in their profile. This would in turn allow for the ability to show industry specific promotions and promote search results relative to a customer's industry to be sorted at the top giving the customer a more personalized experience.

What was the business sponsor looking to validate about the use of promotions?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Performance variance is the difference between the actual and expected results of a business activity or process. In this case, the business sponsor expected that the promotions would be viewed by at least 30% of the customers and that they would help reduce claims. However, the actual results showed that only 5% of the customers viewed the promotions and that claims increased by 20%. The business sponsor wanted to understand the reasons for this discrepancy and how to improve the effectiveness of the promotions.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Paris
3 months ago
I think they need to focus on relevance for better engagement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
3 months ago
I doubt the promotions were the issue, sounds like external factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
3 months ago
Claims increased by 20% during the pilot!
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
4 months ago
Totally agree, that's surprising given the new tools.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
4 months ago
So they didn't target promotions by industry? That's a big miss!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the options. Could it be market trends? But then again, the focus seems more on the promotions' effectiveness rather than broader trends.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
4 months ago
I recall a similar case where targeting promotions based on customer demographics improved engagement. Maybe that’s what the sponsor was hoping to validate here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
4 months ago
I think the business sponsor was looking at performance variance since the promotions weren't being viewed as expected. It seems like a logical area to investigate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serita
5 months ago
I remember studying how important it is to validate the effectiveness of promotional strategies, but I'm not entirely sure which option the sponsor was focused on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
5 months ago
Based on the information provided, I think the business sponsor was looking to validate whether the promotions were effective at driving customer engagement and reducing claims. The low promotion views and increased claims suggest there was an issue there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by all the different features and metrics mentioned. I'll need to focus on identifying the core issue the business sponsor was trying to validate about the promotions specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
5 months ago
Okay, I think the key here is understanding why the claims increased despite the new risk control site. The BA's analysis about the severe winter storms and the irrelevant promotions seems really insightful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
5 months ago
Hmm, the business sponsor was expecting the promotions to be viewed more often, but that didn't happen. I wonder if the issue was that the promotions weren't relevant enough to the customers' industries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
6 months ago
This seems like a complex question with a lot of details to consider. I'll need to carefully read through the information and think through the different factors at play.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosann
10 months ago
The business sponsor must be kicking themselves for not considering industry-specific promotions from the start. Guess they learned the hard way that one-size-fits-all doesn't always work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lon
10 months ago
Hmm, 20% increase in claims? I guess the site couldn't prevent those unavoidable weather-related claims. Gotta love Mother Nature's sense of humor, huh?
upvoted 0 times
Nickole
10 months ago
It's interesting how industry-specific promotions can make a difference in customer engagement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
10 months ago
I heard the site was actually helping reduce claims for other customers though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
10 months ago
Yeah, those winter storms really did a number on the claims.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ezekiel
11 months ago
I thought the BA's analysis was really thorough. Targeting the promotions based on the customer's industry seems like a simple but effective solution to increase engagement.
upvoted 0 times
Elvera
9 months ago
The recommendation to require customers to select their industry in their profile seems like a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
9 months ago
It's great that the survey responses were positive about the site helping to reduce claims.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
10 months ago
I agree, targeting the promotions based on industry makes a lot of sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beatriz
11 months ago
The business sponsor was looking to validate the customer engagement with the promotions feature. It seems like the low usage was due to the promotions not being relevant to the customers' industries.
upvoted 0 times
Paz
9 months ago
The survey responses were positive but customers found the promotions irrelevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
10 months ago
The BA found that similar companies had more relevant promotions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
10 months ago
The promotions should have been more industry-specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viola
11 months ago
Yes, it seems like the focus was on assessing the impact of the promotions on the customers' behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
11 months ago
I agree, they wanted to see if the promotions were effective in reducing claims.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
11 months ago
I think the business sponsor was looking to validate the performance variance of the promotions.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel