IIBA CBAP Exam - Topic 2 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CBAP exam

Question #: 92
Topic #: 2

A business analyst (BA) finds that the proposed solution has features used by a small group of stakeholders for business scenarios which may occur up to three times a year Out require a high effort to implement. What should the BA recommend in this cast?

AChange the related business process

BRemove the requirement

CAssign it a lower priority for future release

DDeliver as part of the initial release

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Luisa at Jul 06, 2024, 10:37 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBAP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Aracelis

10 months ago

Three times a year? Definitely not worth the effort.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawny

10 months ago

Changing the process could work, but it might confuse everyone.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mike

10 months ago

Wow, I can’t believe they’d consider delivering it now. That’s risky!

upvoted 0 times

...

Rochell

10 months ago

I disagree, option C makes more sense. Prioritize it for later!

upvoted 0 times

...

Alberto

11 months ago

Sounds like a classic case for option B. Just remove it!

upvoted 0 times

...

Susana

11 months ago

Delivering it as part of the initial release seems risky, especially if it's rarely used. I think the BA should consider the cost-benefit analysis here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

11 months ago

I feel like changing the business process might be too drastic for such infrequent scenarios. I guess it depends on how critical those features are.

upvoted 0 times

...

Levi

11 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about prioritizing features based on stakeholder impact. Maybe assigning it a lower priority could be the right move?

upvoted 0 times

...

Aaron

11 months ago

I think the BA should probably remove the requirement since it only serves a small group and is high effort. That seems like a common approach in similar practice questions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blondell

11 months ago

I think the key here is balancing the needs of the stakeholders with the effort required. Option C, assigning a lower priority, could be a good compromise if the requirement is important but not critical.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sylvia

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The question is asking what the BA should recommend, but it's not clear if that's the best approach. I might need to think through the tradeoffs a bit more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Devora

11 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question. I'd recommend option B - remove the requirement since it's only used by a small group and requires high effort.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noel

12 months ago

Ah, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards option A, changing the related business process, but I'd want to understand more about the specific scenarios and stakeholder needs first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Truman

12 months ago

I'm pretty confident on this one. The key is to add the 'Adjusted Forecast Quantity' field from the 'Account Product Forecast' object. That should give me the forecasting data I need, including any sales team adjustments.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emerson

12 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. Based on my knowledge of BGP, option C seems to be the correct answer. Router 1 should receive up to two paths from the neighbor for routes in the same AS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willow

12 months ago

I feel like we talked about the default gateway in class. Isn't that where packets go if there's no match?

upvoted 0 times

...

Nana

1 year ago

Wait, are we sure the stakeholders aren't just trying to get their pet project included? Maybe they're using the 'high effort' line to trick the BA. I'd be careful with option D if I were you!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronny

1 year ago

Option D all the way! Deliver it with the initial release. Who cares if it's only used a few times a year? The stakeholders want it, so give it to them. Plus, it'll make them feel special, like VIPs.

upvoted 0 times

Rachael

1 year ago

A: Nah, let's make the stakeholders feel special by delivering it right away. It'll show them we value their needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margurite

1 year ago

B: But wouldn't it be better to assign it a lower priority for future release since it's only used a few times a year?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lemuel

1 year ago

A: I agree, let's give the stakeholders what they want and deliver it with the initial release.

upvoted 0 times

...

Estrella

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Maybe the BA can negotiate with the stakeholders and see if they can live without the feature for now. But if it's really important, a future release might be the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Cathern

1 year ago

User 3: I agree with Cathern, a future release might be the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delbert

1 year ago

User 3: I agree with Delbert, a future release might be the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Effie

1 year ago

User 2: Effie makes a good point, but maybe assigning it a lower priority for future release could work too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Franklyn

1 year ago

User 2: Franklyn makes a good point, but maybe assigning it a lower priority for future release could work too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Domonique

1 year ago

User 1: I think the BA should remove the requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristian

1 year ago

User 1: I think the BA should remove the requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaunna

1 year ago

I'm leaning towards option B. Remove the requirement altogether. If it's not critical to the business, why include it at all? Let's focus on the important stuff.

upvoted 0 times

Domingo

1 year ago

True, but delivering it as part of the initial release could also be an option if it's feasible.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sol

1 year ago

That's a good point. We could also assign it a lower priority for a future release if it's not urgent.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawrence

1 year ago

But what if it's important for a small group of stakeholders? Maybe we should change the related business process instead.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sommer

1 year ago

I think we should consider removing the requirement. It doesn't seem critical to the business.

upvoted 0 times

...

Goldie

1 year ago

I think the BA should recommend option C. Assigning it a lower priority for future release makes the most sense if the feature is only used a few times a year. Why waste resources on something that's not a core requirement?

upvoted 0 times

...