While auditing an organization's credit approval process, an internal auditor learns that the organization has made a large loan to another auditor's relative. Which course of action should the auditor take?
Ooh, this is a tough one. I mean, on one hand, you don't want to jeopardize the whole audit just because of a relative. But on the other hand, you can't just ignore it. I think the auditor should definitely disclose it, but maybe they can find a way to still do the audit without compromising their integrity.
You know, I can see the argument for immediately withdrawing from the audit engagement. That would be the safest option to maintain independence and avoid any appearance of bias. But I can also understand the desire to have management weigh in on it first.
Yeah, I'm with you on that. Transparency is key here. The auditor needs to be upfront about the potential conflict of interest. Hiding it would just make things worse in the long run.
Hmm, I'm not sure. Proceeding with the audit and not including the relative's information doesn't seem right to me. That would be a breach of ethical standards. I think the auditor should disclose the relative's involvement in the final communication.
I agree, this is a tough one. I think the best course of action would be to have the chief audit executive and management determine whether the auditor should continue with the audit engagement. That way, they can assess the potential conflict of interest and make an informed decision.
Wow, this is a tricky situation. The auditor's relative being a customer of the organization being audited definitely raises some ethical concerns. We need to be very careful here to maintain objectivity and independence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Roselle
8 days agoJenelle
10 days agoChandra
11 days agoCyndy
12 days agoMelodie
14 days agoJarod
16 days ago