Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIA Exam IIA-CRMA Topic 7 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIA's IIA-CRMA exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 7
[All IIA-CRMA Questions]

Which of the following techniques would provide the most compelling evidence that a safety hazard exists within a manufacturing facility?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kimberlie
14 hours ago
I'm just hoping the answer isn't 'all of the above' - that would be way too easy!
upvoted 0 times
...
An
2 days ago
But wouldn't D) Review of records involving safety violations also be important to consider?
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
3 days ago
Analyzing facility operating reports might give you a good data-driven perspective, but I feel like actually seeing the operations in person would be more convincing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
4 days ago
Questioning the facility management and safety officer could provide valuable insights, but I'm not sure it would be the most compelling evidence on its own.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
5 days ago
I disagree, I believe C) Analysis of facility operating reports would be more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
7 days ago
I would go with reviewing the safety violation records filed by production employees. They're the ones on the frontlines and likely to spot potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
8 days ago
I think A) Observation of the facility during operations would provide the most compelling evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
10 days ago
Observation of the facility during operations seems like the most comprehensive approach to identify safety hazards. You can directly see the workflows and potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel