I'm going with D) Independence. It's like the old saying, 'can't bite the hand that feeds you.' If the IAA was responsible for the activity, there's no way they could remain independent in their evaluation. Classic case of a self-review threat.
Ah, I see what they're getting at. The key here is that the IAA was responsible for the activity it was assessing. That has to be a breach of C) Objectivity, right? No way you can be impartial in that situation.
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards D) Independence, since the internal audit activity was responsible for the activity it provided assurance services for. That seems like a clear conflict of interest.
This question is testing our understanding of the IIA Code of Ethics. I think the answer is C) Objectivity, since providing assurance services for an activity you're responsible for would impair your ability to be objective.
Glory
30 days agoOsvaldo
1 months agoLuis
8 days agoFreeman
11 days agoBrandee
1 months agoKate
4 days agoKenny
10 days agoIsadora
23 days agoLorrine
2 months agoTheron
12 days agoTeddy
1 months agoLakeesha
1 months agoDana
1 months agoWeldon
2 months agoFelix
1 months agoAleta
1 months agoCasandra
2 months agoNydia
2 months agoNoemi
2 months ago