Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIA Exam IIA-CIA-Part3-3P Topic 13 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIA's IIA-CIA-Part3-3P exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 13
[All IIA-CIA-Part3-3P Questions]

The decision to implement enhanced failure detection and back-up systems to improve data integrity is an example of which risk response?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Bette
2 months ago
I'll go with D) Risk reduction. Enhancing failure detection and back-up systems sounds like a proactive and responsible way to address potential data integrity issues. Although, I do wonder if the 'enhanced' part means they'll be using duct tape and chewing gum. You know, to keep costs down.
upvoted 0 times
Hortencia
23 days ago
Definitely, it's better to prioritize data integrity over cost-cutting measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
1 months ago
Yeah, using duct tape and chewing gum doesn't sound like a reliable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
2 months ago
I think it's important to invest in proper systems rather than cutting corners.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dwight
2 months ago
I agree, D) Risk reduction seems like the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonard
2 months ago
D) Risk reduction is the obvious choice. Implementing back-up systems is a textbook example of a risk mitigation strategy. Although, I'm curious if the back-up systems will be powered by hamsters running on wheels. That would be a unique approach!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
2 months ago
Haha, risk acceptance? Seriously? That's like saying, 'Yes, we know our data could be at risk, but we just don't care!' D) Risk reduction is definitely the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Shannan
27 days ago
User 3: I think implementing back-up systems is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
29 days ago
User 2: Definitely, we should focus on risk reduction instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, risk acceptance seems too risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Angelyn
2 months ago
I'm torn between B) Risk sharing and D) Risk reduction. Sharing the risk through external partnerships could also be a valid approach, but the question specifically mentions improving data integrity, so D) seems more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
3 months ago
I think D) Risk reduction is the correct answer. Implementing enhanced failure detection and back-up systems seems like a proactive measure to minimize the impact of potential data integrity issues.
upvoted 0 times
Beckie
1 months ago
I see your point, but I still think D) Risk reduction is the best option. It's about reducing the impact of any potential failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
2 months ago
I think it could also be C) Risk avoidance. By implementing those systems, you're trying to avoid potential data integrity issues altogether.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
2 months ago
I agree, D) Risk reduction makes sense. It's all about minimizing the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Angella
3 months ago
But couldn't it also be C) Risk avoidance, by trying to prevent failures in the first place?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
3 months ago
I agree with Alpha, implementing back-up systems reduces the risk of data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
3 months ago
I think the answer is D) Risk reduction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
3 months ago
But wouldn't it also be a form of risk avoidance, since it helps prevent data loss in the first place?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
4 months ago
I agree with Pilar, implementing back-up systems reduces the impact of potential failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
4 months ago
I think it's D) Risk reduction.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel