I'll go with D) Risk reduction. Enhancing failure detection and back-up systems sounds like a proactive and responsible way to address potential data integrity issues. Although, I do wonder if the 'enhanced' part means they'll be using duct tape and chewing gum. You know, to keep costs down.
D) Risk reduction is the obvious choice. Implementing back-up systems is a textbook example of a risk mitigation strategy. Although, I'm curious if the back-up systems will be powered by hamsters running on wheels. That would be a unique approach!
Haha, risk acceptance? Seriously? That's like saying, 'Yes, we know our data could be at risk, but we just don't care!' D) Risk reduction is definitely the way to go here.
I'm torn between B) Risk sharing and D) Risk reduction. Sharing the risk through external partnerships could also be a valid approach, but the question specifically mentions improving data integrity, so D) seems more appropriate.
I think D) Risk reduction is the correct answer. Implementing enhanced failure detection and back-up systems seems like a proactive measure to minimize the impact of potential data integrity issues.
Bette
2 months agoHortencia
23 days agoBernadine
1 months agoMaryann
2 months agoDwight
2 months agoLeonard
2 months agoArdella
2 months agoShannan
27 days agoStephen
29 days agoElvera
1 months agoAngelyn
2 months agoCraig
3 months agoBeckie
1 months agoDella
2 months agoRuth
2 months agoAngella
3 months agoMaryrose
3 months agoAlpha
3 months agoJennie
3 months agoMaile
4 months agoPilar
4 months ago